正在加载图片...
DAVIDV MYERS Table 2 stated Component Loa dings for the Kinetie Family drawings (KFD) Components Phvs:ca: proximity m06000 0 Barrers 0 Relative Height ic 6. Arm Ex 8 7. Des 9 3 8. Safeiy of F:re 6-08-36 -12 9, Boy pa 9-8 ! I0 Rotors :2. Compartment 13. Underlining Figures 0 20 4. Bottom: lining -03 18 :6. Encapsulation OS :7. Edged placee:! 74 I&. evasions 02 41 0. Back placemen Eigenvalue .90}1s8 was performed empio\ ing the appropri- on Component were Shading Bottom te set of component scores as the de ining and Top Lin ng For Component pendent variabie. For each significant II scores. no significant main or inter- ifference obtained in each of the anais ses action effects were obtained. The var. o: the component scores. the variabies abies loading most high y on Component ontributing most highiy to the differ- !I were Force Fieids. Description of Ac d the highest component tion. Bodv Parts. Underlining of Indiv'ic loadings for the component from which ua Figures. Evasions. and Back Place alvsis o: varance of the Component i cant efe scores indicated a significant main effect ment, F(L. 12=46.62 p<, 0. but no for adjustment. F1, 112) =7.97. p<,0i. significant effects were obtained for age but no significant effects were obtained or the interaction. The varia bles loadin for the interaction of age and ad ustment. most h: ghly on Component!I were Bar Fhe variabies ioading most high v(+30) ers. Description of Action. Safety cf
<<向上翻页向下翻页>>
©2008-现在 cucdc.com 高等教育资讯网 版权所有