正在加载图片...
2)If don't charge for it, it's not a violation. "False. Whether you charge can affect the damages awarded in court, but that's the main difference under the law. It's still a violation if you give it away-and there can still be serious damages if you hurt the commercial value of the property. There is an exception for personal copying of music, which is not a violation, though courts seem to have said that doesnt include wide-scale anonymous personal copying as Napster. If the work has no commercial value the violation is mostly technical and is unlikely to result in legal action 3"If it's posted to Usenet it's in the public domain. False Nothing modern is in the public domain anymore unless the owner2) “If I don’t charge for it, it’s not a violation.” False. Whether you charge can affect the damages awarded in court, but that’s the main difference under the law. It’s still a violation if you give it away – and there can still be serious damages if you hurt the commercial value of the property. There is an exception for personal copying of music, which is not a violation, though courts seem to have said that doesn’t include wide-scale anonymous personal copying as Napster. If the work has no commercial value, the violation is mostly technical and is unlikely to result in legal action. 3) “If it’s posted to Usenet it’s in the public domain.” False. Nothing modern is in the public domain anymore unless the owner
<<向上翻页向下翻页>>
©2008-现在 cucdc.com 高等教育资讯网 版权所有