正在加载图片...
Why We Are Not Allowed to Sell organs in general are not virtuous. The way to redeem the problems of organ shortage in a given society is not to create a market but rather to increase the sense of virtue 1. There is an important distinction to be made between people who give up their organs while still alive and those who give up their organs po can be given to both groups; one could, for example, imagine a sort of reversed insurance tem where I, on agreeing to the harvesting of certain organs after my death, collect some form of compensation today(monetary or otherwise). This paper, however, will focus on living ndividuals 2. Another example might be the Lutheran opinion of letters of indulgences; it appears that on this view, forgiveness is something that can, and should, be given but never sold. 3. The following argument refers to the situation in an industrialized country, leaving open what further complications might arise in developing countries 4. See, for example, Erin C, Harris J. An ethical market in human organs. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003: 29: 137-8; Rhodes R. Organ transplantation. In: Kuhse H, Singer P, eds. A Companion to Bioethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing: 2001: 329-40 5. See, for example, Harvey J. Paying organ donors. Journal of Medical Ethics 1990: 16: 117-9 6. Titmuss RM. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: George Allen and Unwin: 1970 7. Radcliffe-Richards J. Daar AS, Guttman RD, Hoffenberg R, Kennedy I, Lock M, Sells RA, Tilney N. The case for allowing kidney sales. The Lancet 1998: 352: 1950-2 8. Savluescu J. Is the sale of body parts wrong? Journal of Medical Ethics 2003: 29: 138-9 9. People' s emotional aversions should not be granted the status of an ar t as such(pro or con) but rather as an incentive, a motive, for looking for alternatives to the predominant ntialist arguments. Hence, even if people were to feel differently, the virtuous thing to do would still be to refrain from selling ones orga 10. Kant I. Lectures on Ethics, translated by Louis Infield. New York: Harper &z row: 1963: 124. Se so Stempsey W. Organ markets and human dignity: On selling your body and soul. Christian Bioethics20006(2):195-204. 11. See note 4, Rhodes R. 2001. Also see Savulescu, J. "Taking the plunge, " New Scientist 2001: 169: 50 12. Virtue ethics is frequently accused of not being satisfactorily action guiding: see, for example, Oakley J. A virtue ethics approach. In: Kuhse H, Singer P, eds. A Companion to Bioethics, Oxford Blackwell Publishing, 2001: 86-97: Louden R. On some vices of virtue ethics. American philo- hical Quarterly 1984; 21: 227-36 13. For an ov of the debate see Veatch RM. The place of care in ethical theory. Journal of medicine and Philosophy 1998; 23(2): 210-24; Gillian C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Womens Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982 14. A problem with the Aristotelian definition is that the difference between a virtue and a vice is not obvious. This distinction was further spelled out by Pincoffs, who suggested that a virtue s a trait of character, manifested in habitual action, that is good for a person to have. Pincoffs EL. Quandaries and Virtues: Against Reductionism in Ethics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas 1986:78 15.This could be contrasted with, for example, 16. Crisp R, Slote M, eds. Virtue Ethics. Oxford 17. Swanton C. Virtue Ethics-A Pluralistic Viez 18. Broadie S, Rowe C. Aristotle Nicomachea Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2002: 24. 19. My example draws heavily on Peter Singer's example from his 1972 essay"Famine, Affluence and Morality. See Singer P. Famine, affluence and morality. Philosophy Public Affairs 972;1229-43 20. Again, this should not be interpreted as saying that the consequences of an action are of no matter to the virtue ethicist 21. A possible exception could be if the purpose of forcing the person in the predicament to make a promise is to make him/her refrain from committing a heinous deed that we know for she/he would otherwise commit.in general are not virtuous. The way to redeem the problems of organ shortage in a given society is not to create a market but rather to increase the sense of virtue. Notes 1. There is an important distinction to be made between people who give up their organs while still alive and those who give up their organs posthumously. Naturally monetary compensation can be given to both groups; one could, for example, imagine a sort of reversed insurance system where I, on agreeing to the harvesting of certain organs after my death, collect some form of compensation today (monetary or otherwise). This paper, however, will focus on living individuals. 2. Another example might be the Lutheran opinion of letters of indulgences; it appears that on this view, forgiveness is something that can, and should, be given but never sold. 3. The following argument refers to the situation in an industrialized country, leaving open what further complications might arise in developing countries. 4. See, for example, Erin C., Harris J. An ethical market in human organs. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003;29:137–8; Rhodes R. Organ transplantation. In: Kuhse H, Singer P, eds. A Companion to Bioethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2001:329–40. 5. See, for example, Harvey J. Paying organ donors. Journal of Medical Ethics 1990;16:117–9. 6. Titmuss RM. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: George Allen and Unwin; 1970. 7. Radcliffe-Richards J. Daar AS, Guttman RD, Hoffenberg R, Kennedy I, Lock M, Sells RA, Tilney N. The case for allowing kidney sales. The Lancet 1998;352:1950–2. 8. Savluescu J. Is the sale of body parts wrong? Journal of Medical Ethics 2003;29:138–9. 9. People’s emotional aversions should not be granted the status of an argument as such (pro or con) but rather as an incentive, a motive, for looking for alternatives to the predominant consequentialist arguments. Hence, even if people were to feel differently, the virtuous thing to do would still be to refrain from selling one’s organs. 10. Kant I. Lectures on Ethics, translated by Louis Infield. New York: Harper & Row; 1963:124. See also Stempsey W. Organ markets and human dignity: On selling your body and soul. Christian Bioethics 2000;6(2):195–204. 11. See note 4, Rhodes R. 2001. Also see Savulescu, J. “Taking the plunge,” New Scientist 2001;169:50. 12. Virtue ethics is frequently accused of not being satisfactorily action guiding; see, for example, Oakley J. A virtue ethics approach. In: Kuhse H, Singer P, eds. A Companion to Bioethics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2001:86–97; Louden R. On some vices of virtue ethics. American Philo￾sophical Quarterly 1984;21:227–36. 13. For an overview of the debate see Veatch RM. The place of care in ethical theory. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1998;23(2):210–24; Gillian C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982. 14. A problem with the Aristotelian definition is that the difference between a virtue and a vice is not obvious. This distinction was further spelled out by Pincoffs, who suggested that a virtue is a trait of character, manifested in habitual action, that is good for a person to have. Pincoffs EL. Quandaries and Virtues: Against Reductionism in Ethics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas; 1986:78. 15. This could be contrasted with, for example, Nietzsche’s views. 16. Crisp R, Slote M, eds. Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. 17. Swanton C. Virtue Ethics—A Pluralistic View. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. 18. Broadie S, Rowe C. Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics—Translation, Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002:24. 19. My example draws heavily on Peter Singer’s example from his 1972 essay “Famine, Affluence and Morality.” See Singer P. Famine, affluence and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1972;1:229–43. 20. Again, this should not be interpreted as saying that the consequences of an action are of no matter to the virtue ethicist. 21. A possible exception could be if the purpose of forcing the person in the predicament to make a promise is to make him/her refrain from committing a heinous deed that we know for sure she/he would otherwise commit. Why We Are Not Allowed to Sell Organs 69
<<向上翻页向下翻页>>
©2008-现在 cucdc.com 高等教育资讯网 版权所有