15597ch06099-11210/22/0520:19Pag0101 EQA Keysto the Chapler·1ol istic picture twentieth century.The key features.second order kinetics and inversion of conuration at the substrate carbon,are common to all the reactions in this chapter.The mechanism allows predictions to be made con bles in the of th ns of th in thes swere prdicted ahead of time on thebasis of the loica implications of th nism.Part of you ir job as a student in organic chem ns ass ouns the molecules contain. One fina comment on mee chanisms in general:There exists a common sor of shorthand way of writing indicated by arrws that the movement of pairs of lectrons.For the s process,we have: HO:+CHCCI 一Ho-CH1+C (ofp or leoo8e巴ogas一 nd (2)movement of a pair of from the Mecha 假loge狼 ⊕ using"ctron pushing"in mechanisms as frequently as you can so that you can get used to the technique action of an acid and a base.is shown below. HG:+Hd一Ho-HH,0)+C n the S2 reaction rate:leav of the role each of the thr sion will be:How docs changing this variable affect the activation energ the energy of the transition state relative to that of the starting mate ials?We may not say it in so many words every ti me,but that's what w mean.Evl still b any qu ave,and no actu the S2 tran the en The othe lea work with and is fairly 6-4 Bad"leaving play pivotal roles in organic chemistry.Keys to the Chapter • 101 ical changes. By combining information from these and other types of experiments, the mechanistic picture of the bimolecular nucleophilic displacement, or SN2 reaction, was developed over the first 30-odd years of the twentieth century. The key features, second-order kinetics and inversion of configuration at the substrate carbon, are common to all the reactions in this chapter. The mechanism allows predictions to be made con￾cerning the effects of changing any of a number of variables in the SN2 reaction. The last four sections of the chapter explore the most important of these. It should be pointed out that many of the observations described in these sections were predicted ahead of time on the basis of the logical implications of the SN2 mecha￾nism. Part of your job as a student in organic chemistry will be to develop the ability to predict the result of a reaction of molecules you may never have seen before on the basis of your knowledge of reaction mech￾anisms associated with the functional groups the molecules contain. One final comment on mechanisms in general: There exists a common sort of shorthand way of writing organic reaction mechanisms. First, each step is written separately. Second, bonding changes in each step are indicated by arrows that represent the movement of pairs of electrons. For the SN2 mechanism, a one-step process, we have: The two arrows show (1) movement of a pair of electrons from oxygen to carbon to form the new C— O bond and (2) movement of a pair of electrons from the C—Cl bond to chlorine to form the chloride ion. Mecha￾nism arrows depict the movement of pairs of electrons, not the movement of atoms. This is a logical result of the fact that chemical reactions are due to changes in bonds, and bonds are made out of electrons. Practice using “electron pushing” in mechanisms as frequently as you can so that you can get used to the technique. Note that proper use of electron-pair arrows automatically results in the correct Lewis structures for the prod￾ucts of a reaction, including charges, if any. An example of its application to an even simpler reaction, the re￾action of an acid and a base, is shown below. 6-7, 6-8, and 6-9. The SN2 Reaction in Depth These sections explore the effects of changing three variables on the SN2 reaction rate: leaving group, nucle￾ophile, and substrate structure. All the material in these sections derives logically from a knowledge of the mechanism and an awareness of the role each of the three variables can play. In each of these sections the ef￾fect of the variable on the rate of reaction is considered. This should tell you that the point of each discus￾sion will be: How does changing this variable affect the activation energy—the energy of the transition state relative to that of the starting materials? We may not say it in so many words every time, but that’s what we mean. Even if the discussion is totally qualitative, and no actual rate data are given, the focus of such a dis￾cussion will still be the effect of the variable in question on relative transition state energy. Consideration of the leaving group is fairly simple. Because the leaving group is “beginning to leave” in the SN2 transition state, the energy of the transition state will reflect to some extent the stability of the leav￾ing group. Stable leaving groups are therefore better (interpret: “faster”) leaving groups. The parallel between leaving-group ability and nonbasic character drawn in the chapter is the easiest one to work with and is fairly reliable. “Good” leaving groups are usually the conjugate bases of strong acids (Table 6-4). “Bad” leaving groups are strong bases, i.e., they are the conjugate bases of weak acids. Later you will learn how to manu￾facture good leaving groups out of bad ones. Notice how such fundamental concepts as acid/base strength can play pivotal roles in organic chemistry. Cl HO H Cl HO H (H2O) Cl HO CH3 Cl HO CH3 1559T_ch06_099-112 10/22/05 20:19 Page 101