T Nozawa et aL /Joumal of Nuclear Materials 384(2009)195-211 Hinoki et al. [11] closely investigated the irradiation effect on While there is a growing body of work evaluating the F/M inter- le interfacial shear properties by the push-in technique and com- phase fundamental knowledge about the irradiation effect on the pared the influence on varied interphases: a PyC monolayer, a PyC F/M interphase is still insufficient. Specifically, a fundamental Sic multilayer, and a pseudo 'porous'Sic interphase. By neutron question about the irradiation tolerance of the multilayer inter irradiation up to 0.5 dpa at 300-500C, slight deformation for phase is unanswered. The goal of the following study is to provide any interphase studies was observed. a decrease of interfacial data and analysis of the effect of neutron irradiation on the F/M shear properties was also identified by the double notch shear test interphase to help bridge this knowledge gap method for irradiation up to 1 dpa at 800-1000C for the same se ies of composites [12]. In both Sic/Sic composites with do-porous Sic interphase severely deteriorated their interfacial properties. In recent work by the authors [13], interfacial shear 21. materials properties for Hi-Nicalon Type-S/CVI-SiC composites with either yer or a PyC/SiC multilayer interphase were investi- Materials evaluated were unidirectional SiC/Sic composites gated for the limited irradiation condition (o-7.7 dpa, (Hyper-Therm High-Temperature Composites Inc, Huntington Tirr=800C). The results indicate(1)a very minor irradiation effect Beach, CA)with varied F/M interphases(Table 1). Reinforcing Sic on interfacial shear properties for the monolayer composites and fibers were Hi-Nicalon"M Type-S(3. 1 g/cm Si/C=1.05).A high- (2)a slight irradiation-induced decrease of shear stresses for the purity and high-crystallinity Sic matrix was chemical-vapor-infiI multilayer composites. This difference is somewhat surprising trated. A PyC monolayer or a Py/Sic multilayer interphase was since it has been believed that the thinly-layered carbon interpha- chemically deposited on the fiber surface in advance of matrix den ses would be more radiation-stable sification. Thickness of the Pyc monolayer was 520-720 nm. In contrast, the multilayer interphase d of a sequel Table 1 of w20 nm-thick PyC and 100 nm-thick Sic sub-layers( Fig. 1). Key characteristics of unidirectional Hi-Nicalon Type-S(CVI-SiC composites The fiber volume fraction and porosity were 30-40% and 15-20% Interphase Fiber volume fraction Porosity Density (glcm respectively. The high-porosity of these CVI-SiC/Sic composites ~0.29 ~257 was due primarily to the presence of columnar pores along the Multilayer ~038 ~0.14 2.66 fiber bundles. Key characteristics of these composites have been reported elsewhere [12-14 a b 》 5 1um d 4 um 500nm Fig 1. Typical microstructural images of (a).(b)Pyc monolayer and(c). (d) Pyc/Sic multilayer interphases of as-received SiC/SiC composites[13]Hinoki et al. [11] closely investigated the irradiation effect on the interfacial shear properties by the push-in technique and compared the influence on varied interphases: a PyC monolayer, a PyC/ SiC multilayer, and a pseudo ‘porous’ SiC interphase. By neutron irradiation up to 0.5 dpa at 300–500 C, slight deformation for any interphase studies was observed. A decrease of interfacial shear properties was also identified by the double notch shear test method for irradiation up to 1 dpa at 800–1000 C for the same series of composites [12]. In both cases, SiC/SiC composites with pseudo-porous SiC interphase severely deteriorated their interfacial properties. In recent work by the authors [13], interfacial shear properties for Hi-NicalonTM Type-S/CVI-SiC composites with either a PyC monolayer or a PyC/SiC multilayer interphase were investigated for the limited irradiation condition (/ = 7.7 dpa, Tirr = 800 C). The results indicate (1) a very minor irradiation effect on interfacial shear properties for the monolayer composites and (2) a slight irradiation-induced decrease of shear stresses for the multilayer composites. This difference is somewhat surprising since it has been believed that the thinly-layered carbon interphases would be more radiation-stable. While there is a growing body of work evaluating the F/M interphase, fundamental knowledge about the irradiation effect on the F/M interphase is still insufficient. Specifically, a fundamental question about the irradiation tolerance of the multilayer interphase is unanswered. The goal of the following study is to provide data and analysis of the effect of neutron irradiation on the F/M interphase to help bridge this knowledge gap. 2. Experimental 2.1. Materials Materials evaluated were unidirectional SiC/SiC composites (Hyper-Therm High-Temperature Composites Inc., Huntington Beach, CA) with varied F/M interphases (Table 1). Reinforcing SiC fibers were Hi-NicalonTM Type-S (3.1 g/cm3 , Si/C = 1.05). A highpurity and high-crystallinity SiC matrix was chemical-vapor-infiltrated. A PyC monolayer or a PyC/SiC multilayer interphase was chemically deposited on the fiber surface in advance of matrix densification. Thickness of the PyC monolayer was 520–720 nm. In contrast, the multilayer interphase was composed of a sequence of 20 nm-thick PyC and 100 nm-thick SiC sub-layers (Fig. 1). The fiber volume fraction and porosity were 30–40% and 15–20%, respectively. The high-porosity of these CVI-SiC/SiC composites was due primarily to the presence of columnar pores along the fiber bundles. Key characteristics of these composites have been reported elsewhere [12–14]. Table 1 Key characteristics of unidirectional Hi-NicalonTM Type-S/CVI-SiC composites. Interphase Fiber volume fraction Porosity Density (g/cm3 ) PyC 0.29 0.15 2.57 Multilayer 0.38 0.14 2.66 Fig. 1. Typical microstructural images of (a), (b) PyC monolayer and (c), (d) PyC/SiC multilayer interphases of as-received SiC/SiC composites [13]. 196 T. Nozawa et al. / Journal of Nuclear Materials 384 (2009) 195–211