Part 3:Writing an Argument (40 points) Question 12: Marking Guidelines Reasonably free from errors,substantial length,well-constructed, 36一40 relevant ideas,all the main arguments presented with adequate Excellent examples,good use of complex sentence forms,appropriate choice of words and structures. A few errors,but not too intrusive to the reader's understanding, reasonable length,relevant ideas,main arguments covered,but 32—35 Very good possibly some examples or information missing,few errors in complex sentence forms,few errors in control of structure and words. Reader can follow the argument,but a little interference from errors of structure and choice of words,few errors in subject/verb 25-31 Good agreement,most of the main arguments presented,a little irrelevant information or lack of relevant examples,control of simple sentence structure,but errors in complex sentences. Ideas can be followed without too much difficulty on the part of the reader,argument lacks some coherence,a few errors of structure 24 Pass and choice of words are intrusive,control only of simple sentence forms,errors of subject/verb agreement. Difficult to follow ideas,argument weakly presented,some errors 16-23 Weak even in simple sentence formation,errors in structure and vocabulary are many and are somewhat intrusive. Errors in structure and vocabulary prevent much understanding of 0-15 Very poor the message,serious errors in sentence formation,arguments not well presented. 209Part 3:Writing an Argument (40 points) Question 12: Marking Guidelines 36- 40 Excellent Reasonably free from errors，substantial length, well-constructed, relevant ideas, all the main arguments presented with adequate examples, good use of complex sentence forms, appropriate choice of words and structures. 32- 35 Very good A few errors, but not too intrusive to the reader's understanding， reasonable length, relevant ideas, main arguments covered, but possibly some examples or information missing, few errors in complex sentence forms, few errors in control of structure and words. 25- 31 Good Reader can follow the argument，but a little interference from errors of structure and choice of words, few errors in subject/verb agreement，most of the main arguments presented, a little irrelevant information or lack of relevant examples，control of simple sentence structure, but errors in complex sentences. 24 Pass Ideas can be followed without too much difficulty on the part of the reader, argument lacks some coherence, a few errors of structure and choice of words are intrusive，control only of simple sentence forms, errors of subject/verb agreement. 16- 23 W eak Difficult to follow ideas，argument weakly presented，some errors even in simple sentence formation, errors in structure and vocabulary are many and are somewhat intrusive. 0- 15 Very poor Errors in structure and vocabulary prevent much understanding of the message，serious errors in sentence formation, arguments not well presented. 209