8 Lee et al. Litle.A.C..Burt.D.M.Penton-Voak,1.S.&Perret D. their mate preferences:Cross-cultural variation in women's prefe male fa DeBruine,L M.Jones,B.C..Smith,F.G.Little,A.C Litle,A.C.DeBruine,L M.Jones,B.C.(2011).Exposure men's faces ol Oian.F..Southard.K.A C Southard.工王2oo7 Lonrudinal contingent preferences:E Fishe Bebavior,.34.193-200 191 ch P apa发 Little,A.C Jones,B.C.Penton-Voak,I.S.Burt,D.M.,&Perrett D.1.(Paership starus and the tempora Ecolouy.24.594-595. exual dimorphism in male face shape.P ings of tbe T.C n facial at 2双 H.(2006 G ad s W Thomhill R Ga C.E.(2010 Men's facial masculinity predicts changes in their female sexua acros Cardon, ogy for genetic Penton-V Penton oak.1.s.Perret.D.1.Castles.D.L.Kobayash Huk,T.,Winkel,W.G.(2008). 742 s(e Keller.M.C.&Coventry.W.L(2005).Quantifying and of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness.NVatre,394. L.S..Oberzaucher.E..Katina.S..Holzleitner.I.I. Keller.M.C.Medland.. E.Duncan.L.E.(201).Are parison of the bias. Evolution G Hfuman Bebavtor.3.708-714. stimated in four twin family models.Bebavior Genelics. Posthuma,D..Beem A.L..de G J.C..van Baal Lee,A.Dubbs,L.Kelly,A.von Hippel.W.Brooks, B.L (2003).Theory and practice n genetics and resource provision potential Bebo Ecolog) on in humans.Erolution Human Bebavior.31. Rantala.M.I.Moore E.R skrinda T..Kivleniece. masculine male fac s:Comment on scout etal. Kecko,.,&Krams,1.(2012).Evidence for the stress-linke Eol0g,24590-591 immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in humans.Natre 8 Lee et al. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L. M., & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2405–2410. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Smith, F. G., & Little, A. C. (2010). Are attractive men’s faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 751–758. Edwards, C. B., Marshall, S. D., Qian, F., Southard, K. A., Franciscus, R. G., & Southard, T. E. (2007). Longitudinal study of facial skeletal growth completion in 3 dimen￾sions. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, 132, 762–768. Fisher, R. A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review, 7, 184–192. Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139, 602–622. Gangestad, S. W., & Eaton, M. A. (2013). Toward an integra￾tive perspective on sexual selection and men’s masculinity. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 594–595. Gangestad, S. W., & Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523–548. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism [Target article plus commentaries]. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2010). Men’s facial masculinity predicts changes in their female partners’ sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle, whereas men’s intelligence does not. Evolution & Human Behavior, 31, 412–424. Garver-Apgar, C. E., Eaton, M. A., Tybur, J. M., & Thompson, M. E. (2011). Evidence of intralocus sexual conflict: Physically and hormonally masculine individuals have more attractive brothers relative to sisters. Evolution & Human Behavior, 32, 423–432. Huk, T., & Winkel, W. G. (2008). Testing the sexy son hypoth￾esis—a research framework for empirical approaches. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 456–461. Keller, M. C., & Coventry, W. L. (2005). Quantifying and addressing parameter indeterminacy in the classical twin design. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8, 201–213. Keller, M. C., Medland, S. E., & Duncan, L. E. (2010). Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A com￾parison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models. Behavior Genetics, 40, 377–393. Lee, A. J., Dubbs, S. L., Kelly, A. J., von Hippel, W., Brooks, R. C., & Zietsch, B. P. (2013). Human facial attributes, but not perceived intelligence, are used as cues of health and resource provision potential. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 779–787. Little, A. C. (2013). Multiple motives in women’s preferences for masculine male faces: Comment on Scott et al. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 590–591. Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268, 39–44. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2011). Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes prefer￾ences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 2032–2039. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2012). Environment contingent preferences: Exposure to visual cues of direct male–male competition and wealth increase women’s pref￾erences for masculinity in male faces. Evolution & Human Behavior, 34, 193–200. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 1638–1659. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1095–1100. Mitchem, D. G., Purkey, A. M., Grebe, N. M., Carey, G., Garver￾Apgar, C. E., Bates, T. C., . . . Keller, M. C. (2013). Estimating the sex-specific effects of genes on facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism. Behavior Genetics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10519-013-9627-5 Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2006). Mx: Statistical modeling. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University. Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Boston, MA: Kluwer. Penton-Voak, I. S., & Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testos￾terone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution & Human Behavior, 25, 229–241. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741– 742. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., . . . Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887. Pfluger, L. S., Oberzaucher, E., Katina, S., Holzleitner, I. J., & Grammer, K. (2012). Cues to fertility: Perceived attrac￾tiveness and facial shape predict reproductive success. Evolution & Human Behavior, 33, 708–714. Posthuma, D., Beem, A. L., de Geus, E. J. C., van Baal, G. C. M., von Hjelmborg, J. B., Lachine, I., & Boomsma, D. I. (2003). Theory and practice in quantitative genetics. Twin Research, 6, 361–376. Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution & Human Behavior, 31, 157–175. Rantala, M. J., Moore, F. R., Skrinda, I., Krama, T., Kivleniece, I., Kecko, S., & Krams, I. (2012). Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in humans. Nature Downloaded from pss.sagepub.com by Cai Xing on January 7, 2014