against Communist aggressions Before any American troops were committed to Vietnam, a leader of another Asian country expressed this opinion to me when I was traveling in Asia as a private citizen He said: " When you are trying to assist another nation defend its freedom, United States policy should be to help them fight the war, but not to fight the war for them Well in accordance with this wise counsel, I laid down in Guam three principles of guidelines for future American policy toward Asia First, the United States will deep all of its treaty commitments Second, we shall provide a shield if a nuclear power threatens the freedom of a nation allied with us, or of a nation whose survival we consider vital to our security Third, in cases involving other types of aggression we shall furnish military and economic assistance when requested in accordance with our treaty commitments. But we shall look tion directly threatened to assume the primary responsibility of pro for its defense d th y, I found that the leaders of the Philippi South Korea and other nations which might be threatened by Communist aggression, welcomed this new direction in American foreign policy The defense of freedom is everybody's business- not just America's business. And it is particularly the responsibility of the people whose freedom is threatened. In the previous Administration. we Americanized the war in vietnam. In this Administration we are Vietnamizing the search for peace The policy of the previous Administration not only resulted in our assuming the primary responsibility for fighting the war, but even more significant did not adequately stress the goal of strengthening the South Vietnamese so that they could defend themselves when we left The Vietnamization plan was launched following Secretary Laird,s visit to Vietnam in March Under the plan, I ordered first a substantial increase in the training and equip ment of South Vietnamese forces consistent with the objectives of our new polin: General Abrams's orders so that they were In July, on my visit to Vietnam, I changed Under the new orders, the primary mission of our troops is to enable the South Vietnamese forces to assume the full responsibility for the security of South Vietnam. Our air operations have been reduced by over 20 per cent And now we have begun to see the results of this long-overdue change in American policy inagainst Communist aggressions. Before any American troops were committed to Vietnam, a leader of another Asian country expressed this opinion to me when I was traveling in Asia as a private citizen. He said: “When you are trying to assist another nation defend its freedom, United States policy should be to help them fight the war, but not to fight the war for them.” Well in accordance with this wise counsel, I laid down in Guam three principles of guidelines for future American policy toward Asia . First, the United States will deep all of its treaty commitments. Second, we shall provide a shield if a nuclear power threatens the freedom of a nation allied with us, or of a nation whose survival we consider vital to our security. Third, in cases involving other types of aggression we shall furnish military and economic assistance when requested in accordance with our treaty commitments. But we shall look to the nation directly threatened to assume the primary responsibility of providing the manpower for its defense. After I announced this policy, I found that the leaders of the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, South Korea and other nations which might be threatened by Communist aggression, welcomed this new direction in American foreign policy. The defense of freedom is everybody’s business -- not just America’s business. And it is particularly the responsibility of the people whose freedom is threatened. In the previous Administration, we Americanized the war in Vietnam. In this Administration, we are Vietnamizing the search for peace. The policy of the previous Administration not only resulted in our assuming the primary responsibility for fighting the war, but even more significant did not adequately stress the goal of strengthening the South Vietnamese so that they could defend themselves when we left. The Vietnamization plan was launched following Secretary Laird’s visit to Vietnam in March. Under the plan, I ordered first a substantial increase in the training and equip ment of South Vietnamese forces. In July, on my visit to Vietnam, I changed General Abrams’s orders so that they were consistent with the objectives of our new policies. Under the new orders, the primary mission of our troops is to enable the South Vietnamese forces to assume the full responsibility for the security of South Vietnam. Our air operations have been reduced by over 20 per cent. And now we have begun to see the results of this long-overdue change in American policy in