insight overview 8.Tilman,D.Downing.1A.Biodiversity and stability in grasslands.Nanere 367,363-365(1994). biodiversity provides a good start.Additional work,at the interface McGrady-Steed,1 Harris,P.M.&Morin,P.1.Biodiversity regulates predictability. 390.162-165(19971. between ecology and economics,is needed to quantify the immediate 10.Nacem,S.&Li.S.Biodiversity enhances ecsystem reliability.,507-509(1997). and long-term costs and benefits of alternative actions. 11.Doak,D.FtaThe statistical inevitability of stability-diversity relationships in community ccology. The world that will exist in 100 and 1,000 vears will,unavoidably, Aum.Nat151,264-276(1998). be ofhuman design,whether deliberate or haphazard.The principles 12.Talman,D..Lehman,C.L&Bristow,C.E.Diversity-stability relationships:statistical inevitabilityor that should guide this design must be based on science,much of it ecological consequence?Am.Nat.151,277-282(1998). done only sketchily to date,and on ethics.Ethics should,among 13.Talman,D.Biodiversity:population versusecsystem stabality Ecology77,350-363(1996). 14.Taman,D.The ecologi other things,apportion costs and benefits between individuals and Ea00y80,1455-1474（1999). society as a whole,and between current generations and all future 15.Hastings,A.Disturbance,coexistence,history,and competition for space.Theor.Popul Biol.18, 363-373(1980). generations.A sustainable world will require an ethic that is ultimate- 16.Armstrong.R.A.McGehee,R.Competitive exclusion.Am.Nat.115,151-170(1980). ly as incorporated into culture and as long lasting as a constitutional 17.Huisman,1.&Weissing.F.I Biodiversity of phytoplankton by and chaos.Narre bill of rights or as religious commandments.The Earth will retain its 402,407-410(1999) most striking feature,its biodiversity,only if humans have the ity Structure(Monographs in Population Biology. Princeton Univ.Press.1982) prescience to do so.This will occur,it seems,only if we realize the 19.Loreau.M.Biodiversity and ecosystem functio mistic model Proc.Natl Acnd.Sci.USA extent to which we use biodiversity. ▣ 95,5632-5636(1998)1. 20 Timan D.Lehman.C L&Tho osystem productivity:theoretical 1.Vitousek,B.M.,Mooney,H.A.,Lubchenco,I.Melillo,I.M.Human domination ofearth's coasidcnalion.Pmac NatlAcnd.Sc.USA94,1857-1861(1997. ecosystems.Science277,494-99(1997). 21.Huston,M.A.Hidden treatments in ecological experiments:re-evaluating the ecosystem function of 2.Darwin.C.The Origin of Species by Means of Natral Selection (reprinted by The Modern Library. biodiversity.Oecologia 110,449-160(1997) Random House,New York.1859). 22.LW.High productivity in:effected by species diversity or productive 3.Elton,C.S.The Ecology of Imusions by Animals and Plants (Methuen,London,1958). species2Okos80,183-184(1997). 4.Schulze,ED.&Mooney.H.A Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function(Springer,Berlin,1993). 23.Daily,G.C.Natures De s(Island,Washington DC,1997) 5.Tilman,D.,Wedin,D.Knops,I.Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in 24.Feht,W.H.Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of Five Major Crop Plants(Crop Science Society of grassland ecosystems.Nature 379,718-720(1996). America.Madison.WL 1984) 6. Tima D..D.Reich,P,Ritche,M&Siemam.E.The inluence of functional 25.Roelfs,A.P.Ger etic control ofphe enotypes in rust. Annu.Rev.Phytopathol 26,351-367 diversity and composition on ecosystem processes.Science 277,1300-1302(1997). 1988). 7.Hector,A.etal Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands.Science286 26.Maddison,A.Monitoring the World Economy 1820-1992(Development Centre of the Organization 1123-1127(1999). for Economic Co-operationand Development,Paris,1995). NATURE|VOL 40511 MAY 2000www.nature.com 2000 Macmillan Magazines Ltd 211biodiversity provides a good start. Additional work, at the interface between ecology and economics, is needed to quantify the immediate and long-term costs and benefits of alternative actions. The world that will exist in 100 and 1,000 years will, unavoidably, be of human design, whether deliberate or haphazard. The principles that should guide this design must be based on science, much of it done only sketchily to date, and on ethics. Ethics should, among other things, apportion costs and benefits between individuals and society as a whole, and between current generations and all future generations. A sustainable world will require an ethic that is ultimate￾ly as incorporated into culture and as long lasting as a constitutional bill of rights or as religious commandments. The Earth will retain its most striking feature, its biodiversity, only if humans have the prescience to do so. This will occur, it seems, only if we realize the extent to which we use biodiversity. ■ 1. Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J. & Melillo, J. M. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277, 494–499 (1997). 2. Darwin, C. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (reprinted by The Modern Library, Random House, New York, 1859). 3. Elton, C. S. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants(Methuen, London, 1958). 4. Schulze, E. D. & Mooney, H. A. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function (Springer, Berlin, 1993). 5. Tilman, D., Wedin, D. & Knops, J. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379, 718–720 (1996). 6. Tilman, D., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Reich, P., Ritchie, M. & Siemann, E. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277, 1300–1302 (1997). 7. Hector, A. et al. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286, 1123–1127 (1999). 8. Tilman, D. & Downing, J.A. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367, 363–365 (1994). 9. McGrady-Steed, J., Harris, P. M. & Morin, P. J. Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature 390, 162–165 (1997). 10. Naeem, S. & Li, S. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390, 507–509 (1997). 11. Doak, D. F. et al. The statistical inevitability of stability-diversity relationships in community ecology. Am. Nat. 151, 264–276 (1998). 12. Tilman, D., Lehman, C. L. & Bristow, C. E. Diversity-stability relationships: statistical inevitability or ecological consequence? Am. Nat. 151, 277–282 (1998). 13. Tilman, D. Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77, 350–363 (1996). 14. Tilman, D. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80, 1455–1474 (1999). 15. Hastings, A. Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theor. Popul. Biol. 18, 363–373 (1980). 16. Armstrong, R. A. & McGehee, R. Competitive exclusion. Am. Nat. 115, 151–170 (1980). 17. Huisman, J. & Weissing, F. J. Biodiversity of phytoplankton by species oscillations and chaos. Nature 402, 407–410 (1999). 18. Tilman, D. Resource Competition and Community Structure(Monographs in Population Biology, Princeton Univ. Press, 1982). 19. Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5632–5636 (1998). 20. Tilman, D., Lehman, C. L. & Thomson, K. T. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1857–1861 (1997). 21. Huston, M. A. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110, 449–460 (1997). 22. Aarssen, L. W. High productivity in grassland ecosystems: effected by species diversity or productive species? Oikos 80, 183–184 (1997). 23. Daily, G. C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (Island, Washington DC, 1997). 24. Fehr, W. H. Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of Five Major Crop Plants(Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 1984). 25. Roelfs, A. P. Genetic control of phenotypes in wheat stem rust. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 26, 351–367 (1988). 26. Maddison, A. Monitoring the World Economy 1820-1992 (Development Centre of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 1995). insight overview NATURE | VOL 405 | 11 MAY 2000 | www.nature.com © 2000 Macmillan Magazines Ltd 211