stated that freshmen students may feel forced to participate in something they do not fully understand. Hank Greely, director of the Center for Law and the Biosciences at Stanford University where a similar testing program is taking place for medical students, noted that if students had received individual test results, they could have misinterpreted the information and made misinformed health decisions Jeremy Gruber, president of the council for Responsible Genetics, told Inside Higher Ed, The university didn't do its homework. The university was caught with not having sufficiently reviewed the regulatory environment to even understand what would be required to process the DNA samples. According to SF Gate, although Schlissel disagreed with the department's decision, the university will continue with its research, but will no longer give students access to their personal results, which Arthur Caplan, director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania, told Inside Higher Ed, is still effective. " It's less sexy, but it's interesting "Caplan said Schlissel also noted that the controversy may have been beneficial as it encourages broader discussions. It opens up a whole lot of questions, he said. Who has the authority to tell individual what theyre allowed to know about themselves?stated that freshmen students may feel forced to participate in something they do not fully understand. Hank Greely, director of the Center for Law and the Biosciences at Stanford University where a similar testing program is taking place for medical students, noted that if students had received individual test results, they could have misinterpreted the information and made misinformed health decisions. Jeremy Gruber, president of the council for Responsible Genetics, told Inside Higher Ed, "The university didn't do its homework. The university was caught with not having sufficiently reviewed the regulatory environment to even understand what would be required to process the DNA samples." According to SF Gate, although Schlissel disagreed with the department's decision, the university will continue with its research, but will no longer give students access to their personal results, which Arthur Caplan, director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania, told Inside Higher Ed, is still effective. "It's less sexy, but it's interesting," Caplan said. Schlissel also noted that the controversy may have been beneficial as it encourages broader discussions. "It opens up a whole lot of questions," he said. "Who has the authority to tell an individual what they're allowed to know about themselves?