(3)World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Procedures (4)Intemational Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (5)Other Arbitration Tribunals 3.Settlement of Disputes in Municipal Courts (1)Jurisdiction in Criminal Cases (2)Jurisdiction in Civil Cases ()Jurisdictior ver Person 4.Immunities of States from the Jurisdiction of Municipal Courts (1)Sovereign or State Immunity (2)Act of State Doctrine 5.Choosing the Governing Law (1)Agreement ofthe Parties (2)Statutory Choice aw Provisions (3)Most Significant Relationship (4)Governmental Interest 6 Refusal to Exercise lurisdiction 7.Opposition to the Exercise of Jurisdiction 9.Recognition of Foreign Judgments (三)思考与实践 1.Case Study:Japan-Taxesn Alcoholic Beverages 2.Case Study:In the Matter of the Loewen Group Inc.and Raymond L.Loewen. Claimants/Investors v.United States of America Respondent/Party 3.Discuss.Restrictive Sovereign Immunity The London Court of Arbitration has granted an arbitral award to Gee Co.The award ch o f contract fo the carriage of goods.Gee Co.seeks to enforce the award in a British court.H.R.R. pleads that it is immune.What will the court decide? (四)教学方法与手段 教学方法：课堂讲授、分组讨论、案例分析、课内外作业、调查研究和社会 实践、慕课、微课、翻转课堂等。 教学手段：投影、幻灯、计算机、网络辅助教学等多媒体手段。 111 (3) World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Procedures (4) International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (5) Other Arbitration Tribunals 3.Settlement of Disputes in Municipal Courts (1) Jurisdiction in Criminal Cases (2) Jurisdiction in Civil Cases (3) Jurisdiction over Persons 4. Immunities of States from the Jurisdiction of Municipal Courts (1) Sovereign or State Immunity (2) Act of State Doctrine 5.Choosing the Governing Law (1) Agreement of the Parties (2) Statutory Choice of Law Provisions (3) Most Significant Relationship (4) Governmental Interest 6.Refusal to Exercise Jurisdiction 7.Opposition to the Exercise of Jurisdiction 8Proving Foreign Law 9.Recognition of Foreign Judgments （三）思考与实践 1. Case Study: Japan—Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages 2.Case Study: In the Matter of the Loewen Group Inc. and Raymond L. Loewen, Claimants/Investors v. United States of America Respondent/Party 3.Discuss. Restrictive Sovereign Immunity The London Court of Arbitration has granted an arbitral award to Gee Co. The award requires H.R.R., the state-owned railway company in State H, to pay damages to Gee Co., a company headquartered and incorporated in State G, for breach of contract for the carriage of goods. Gee Co. seeks to enforce the award in a British court. H.R.R. pleads that it is immune. What will the court decide? （四）教学方法与手段 教学方法：课堂讲授、分组讨论、案例分析、课内外作业、调查研究和社会 实践、慕课、微课、翻转课堂等。 教学手段：投影、幻灯、计算机、网络辅助教学等多媒体手段