58 The UMAP Journal 28.3(2007) Mean Time to board small sized aircraft Outside D Back-to-Front (3 groups m Backto-Front(27 groups) o Roller Coaster Figure 2. Results of boarding strategies on small aircrat Again, the Roller Coaster method proved the most effective Mean Time to Board Me dium si ed Aircrafts 口 Randon a Back to-Font(2 groups a BacktoFont.(3 goups) ■ Back-to-Front6gups) a Back to-Font(groups) a Back-to-Front (12 groups n Roler Coaster Figure 3. Results of boarding strategies on midsize aircraft. Large plane Figure 4 shows that the boarding time for a large aircraft, unlike the other lane configurations, drops off when moving from the random boarding al-458 The UMAP Journal 28.3 (2007) Figure 2. Results of boarding strategies on small aircraft. Again, the Roller Coaster method proved the most effective. Figure 3. Results of boarding strategies on midsize aircraft. Large Plane Figure 4 shows that the boarding time for a large aircraft, unlike the other plane configurations, drops off when moving from the random boarding al￾Mean lime to Board Small Sized Aircraft 1400 1200 1000 a Random 0• 800 - Outside-h 0 o Back-to-Front (3 groups) w 600 o Back-to-Front (9 groups) m Back-to-Front (27 groups) 400 C Roller Coaster 200 0 ------ • .. Mean Time to Board Medium Sized Aircrafts 1200 1000 a Random "" 800 - Outside-in o Back-to-Front (2 groups) 0 S600 o Back-to-Front (3 groups) * n Back4o-Front (6 groups) E 400 a Back-to-Front (9groups) n Back-to-Front (12 groups) 200 - a Roller Coaster 0 L