数学中国 Ww. madio net Better Living througi: Math 145 Let A, denote the accessibility of the healthcare system for an individual in Group i, and let T; represent the successful treatment of an individual in group i. We weight each of these probabilities as follows A AAA fi=1; fff 2 (1-A) i=3. We will assume that treatment scales in the same way, so we have fi=1; T if i= 2 T+(1-T)C, The rationale for these weightings is that A and T increase as wealth in By considering healthcare with respect to the actual distribution of wealth, we add a great of richness to the model. Adjusted meta-metrics are given in Table 2. Table 2. Adjusted probabilities for economic dasses. Class U Accessibility A 61 11 Analysis of U.S. Healthcare Applying the data from Table 1 to (2) gives retention values shown in Table 3. These values show that the model preserves the earlier rankings. Table 3 Retention values Sweden United States 18.9 Our interests lie in using this model to make predictive judgments about changes tothe U.S. system. Toidentify the areas in which the retention of the U.S. system is most susceptible to change, we vary one meta-metric while holding the others constant. As seen in Figure 2, the slope is much larger for prevention; retention responds more to changes in prevention than in数学中国ww.madio.net