Criticism on the definition 1. It is totally unrealistic and idealistic(how often is anyone truly feel in a state of ' complete. well being ?) 2. It implies a static position, whereas life and living are anything but static 3. It appears to assume that someone somewhere, has the ability and right to define a state of health whereas we have seen that people define health in many waysCriticism on the definition 1. It is totally unrealistic and idealistic (how often is anyone truly feel in a state of ‘complete…wellbeing’?) 2. It implies a static position, whereas life and living are anything but static. 3. It appears to assume that someone, somewhere, has the ability and right to define a state of health, whereas we have seen that people define health in many ways