284 HEERDINK.VAN KLEEF.HOMAN.AND FISCHER .5.(1951)De h A.De Dre C..The in (006)Get mad and get more than eve 4.510 d A S R (2010)A al dec mart Richman.L..Leary.M.R.(2009).Reactions to discriminatio (Eds.).Affect.c sses in s,J.J..Klinnert,M.D.(1985 Group Spoor.J.R&Kely.R().The evolutionary of affect 736843020406145 nScual rcholegy 1407-147 01037 r.A.H.&Leach.C.W.(004).Put g.D..Hogg.M.A..Hon ffect behavior 2005).The us lead utod r.F.A.Wil Tdens C.W.L Cambridge University 010 id of red,yellow nd blue？N 986). the Vr m-Yetton do0.0 al Revie (2000).Catching r C.K.T.Choi W.12000 eing igno D. d to l )003 514746150 2.69-706db10.701461672723709 Time Received February 9,2012 Sani, F. (2005). When subgroups secede: Extending and refining the social psychological model of schism in groups. Personality and Social Psy￾chology Bulletin, 31, 1074 –1086. doi:10.1177/0146167204274092 Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190 –208. doi:10.1037/h0062326 Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus. Acad￾emy of Management Journal, 29, 51–71. doi:10.2307/255859 Sinaceur, M., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Get mad and get more than even: When and why anger expression is effective in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 314 –322. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005 .05.002 Smart Richman, L., & Leary, M. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365–383. doi:10.1037/ a0015250 Smith, E. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297–315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Sorce, J. F., Emde, R. N., Campos, J. J., & Klinnert, M. D. (1985). Maternal emotional signaling: Its effect on the visual cliff behavior of 1-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 21, 195–200. doi:10.1037/ 0012-1649.21.1.195 Spoor, J. R., & Kelly, J. R. (2004). The evolutionary significance of affect in groups: Communication and group bonding. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 398 – 412. doi:10.1177/1368430204046145 Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Jour￾nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478. doi:10.1037/ 0022-3514.48.6.1467 Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psycho￾logical Inquiry, 14, 304 –313. Steinel, W., Van Kleef, G. A., Van Knippenberg, D., Hogg, M. A., Homan, A. C., & Moffitt, G. (2010). How intragroup dynamics affect behavior in intergroup conflict: The role of group norms, prototypicality, and need to belong. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 779 –794. doi: 10.1177/1368430210375702 Sy, T., Côté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: Impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 295–305. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.295 Tiedens, L. Z., Sutton, R. I., & Fong, C. T. (2004). Emotional variation in work groups. In L. Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 164 –186). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819568.010 Tjosvold, D., Wedley, W. C., & Field, R. H. G. (1986). Constructive controversy, the Vroom–Yetton model, and managerial decision￾making. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 7, 125–138. doi:10.1002/ job.4030070205 Totterdell, P. (2000). Catching moods and hitting runs: Mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sport teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 848 – 859. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.848 Totterdell, P., Kellett, S., Teuchmann, K., & Briner, R. B. (1998). Evidence of mood linkage in work groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1504 –1515. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1504 Twenge, J. M., Catanese, K. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Social exclusion and the deconstructed state: Time perception, meaningless￾ness, lethargy, lack of emotion, and self-awareness. Journal of Person￾ality and Social Psychology, 85, 409 – 423. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3 .409 van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychologi￾cal Science, 18, 184 –188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004a). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 57–76. doi:10.1037/0022-3514 .86.1.57 van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004b). The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: A motivated informa￾tion processing approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 510 –528. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.510 van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emo￾tions as social information model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 45–96. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42002-X van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., & Damen, F. (2009). Searing sentiment or cold cal￾culation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 562–580. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331253 van Kleef, G. A., Steinel, W., van Knippenberg, D., Hogg, M. A., & Svensson, A. (2007). Group member prototypicality and intergroup negotiation: How one’s standing in the group affects negotiation behav￾ior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 129 –152. doi:10.1348/ 014466605X89353 van Kleef, G. A., Van Doorn, E. A., Heerdink, M. W., & Koning, L. F. (2011). Emotion is for influence. European Review of Social Psychol￾ogy, 22, 114 –163. doi:10.1080/10463283.2011.627192 van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and re￾search agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008 –1022. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008 van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tenden￾cies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Person￾ality and Social Psychology, 87, 649 – 664. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5 .649 Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). The positive group affect spiral: A dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 239 –261. doi:10.1002/ job.505 Wesselmann, E. D., Butler, F. A., Williams, K. D., & Pickett, C. L. (2010). Adding injury to insult: Unexpected rejection leads to more aggressive responses. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 232–237. doi:10.1002/ab.20347 Wiersema, D. V., van der Schalk, J., & van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Who’s afraid of red, yellow, and blue? Need for cognitive closure predicts aesthetic preferences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 168 –174. doi:10.1037/a0025878 Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425– 452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641 Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748 –762. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748 Williams, K. D., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). Social ostracism by coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 693–706. doi:10.1177/0146167297237003 Received February 9, 2012 Revision received April 15, 2013 Accepted April 30, 2013
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. 284 HEERDINK, VAN KLEEF, HOMAN, AND FISCHER