further such incidents and 2. mulloney would inform Madison that any further"incident"between himself a trainee would result in his discharge 3. Mulloney would advise Madison not to frequent the Club room for the next two months(after which time the present intern group-Jones, Vaughn and Seiler among them-would have completed the training program and most likely moved into positions elsewhere in the agency or in other agencies) 4 Madison could return to work on thursday After a certain amount of prodding from Dr. Herman, Mulloney agreed to present the proposal to Madison. Mulloney said he was reasonably convinced he could get Mad ison to agree, because he knew that Madison himself was worried about being discharged. The four-point plan might be a welcome alternative, especially if it didn't involve a loss of pay The next morning Mulloney, in the presence of Clarence Miller, presented the plan to Madison, not telling him that it had been formulated by the interns. Both Mulloney and miller po inted out that while they realized the whole series of incidents had two sides and that Madison hadnt voiced his, the probability of further difficulties was high if he didnt accept. Miller, in turn, said to Mad ison that if he wanted to file a grievance he could-that the union would carry the case to arbitration if necessary. But, said Miller, you're not losing any money, and maybe a loss of a little face isn' t too bad when the stakes are this high Madison agreed, and this information was later conveyed to Hotchkiss, Associate Director Garrow, Dr. Herman, and Director Stafford. Hot who had left the Wednesday meeting early, called Mulloney and congratulated him, saying Pat, it's been a pleasure to work with you on this It's good to know we can hammer out our problems together Mulloney thanked him, but his relief was only temporary On Friday morning. april 4, Mulloney received the following memorandum MID-STATES COMMUNITY SERVICES Housing Department MEMORANDUM April 3, 19 Patrick mullaney FROM: Thomas Hotchkiss I want to confirm this mornings telephone conversation As I said this morning, I wanted you to know how grateful we throughout the agency are to you for your thoughtful and careful handling of the recent series of incidents concerning the member of the technical staff and several of our interns. Both Director Stafford and I feel that you could not have been more helpful and cooperative, and we are very grateful and highly appreciative for all the assistance and the considerable number of hours you have invested toward solution of the problem I now believe that the solution consisting of the technician's apologies to each of the interns, his assurance to you and to them that there will be no further incidents and your communicating to him that any further incident would result in his being dismissed from the agency, adds up to a good solution with one possible concern only aining. That concern is the one that Director Stafford and I share; namely, that because of the erratic behavior of the technician in question, we would like to have you discuss this with Dr. Andrew Roseberger. Head of MCS Health Services. and arrange for the technician to be interviewed and thereby certified by competent medical staff. Ifurther such incidents. 2.Mulloney would inform Madison that any further “incident” between himself and a trainee would result in his discharge. 3.Mulloney would advise Madison not to frequent the Club Room for the next two months (after which time the present intern group—Jones, Vaughn and Seiler among them—would have completed the training program and most likely moved into positions elsewhere in the agency or in other agencies). 4.Madison could return to work on Thursday. After a certain amount of prodding from Dr. Herman, Mulloney agreed to present the proposal to Madison. Mulloney said he was reasonably convinced he could get Madison to agree, because he knew that Madison himself was worried about being discharged. The four-point plan might be a welcome alternative, especially if it didn’t involve a loss of pay. The next morning Mulloney, in the presence of Clarence Miller, presented the plan to Madison, not telling him that it had been formulated by the interns. Both Mulloney and Miller pointed out that while they realized the whole series of incidents had two sides and that Madison hadn’t voiced his, the probability of further difficulties was high if he didn’t accept. Miller, in turn, said to Madison that if he wanted to file a grievance he could—that the union would carry the case to arbitration, if necessary. “But,” said Miller, “you’re not losing any money, and maybe a loss of a little face isn’t too bad when the stakes are this high.” Madison agreed, and this information was later conveyed to Hotchkiss, Associate Director Garrow, Dr. Herman, and Director Stafford. Hotchkiss, who had left the Wednesday meeting early, called Mulloney and congratulated him, saying, “Pat, it’s been a pleasure to work with you on this. It’s good to know we can hammer out our problems together.” Mulloney thanked him, but his relief was only temporary. On Friday morning, April 4, Mulloney received the following memorandum. MID-STATES COMMUNITY SERVICES Housing Department MEMORANDUM April 3, 19 TO: Patrick Mulloney FROM: Thomas Hotchkiss I want to confirm this morning’s telephone conversation. As I said this morning, I wanted you to know how grateful we throughout the agency are to you for your thoughtful and careful handling of the recent series of incidents concerning the member of the technical staff and several of our interns. Both Director Stafford and I feel that you could not have been more helpful and cooperative, and we are very grateful and highly appreciative for all the assistance and the considerable number of hours you have invested toward solution of the problem. I now believe that the solution consisting of the technician’s apologies to each of the interns, his assurance to you and to them that there will be no further incidents, and your communicating to him that any further incident would result in his being dismissed from the agency, adds up to a good solution with one possible concern only remaining. That concern is the one that Director Stafford and I share; namely, that because of the erratic behavior of the technician in question, we would like to have you discuss this with Dr. Andrew Roseberger, Head of MCS Health Services, and arrange for the technician to be interviewed and thereby certified by competent medical staff. I