the need for contact between intellectuals and simple it is not in order to restri scientif ic activity and preserve unity at the level of the masses, but precisely to construct an intellectual-moral bloc which can make politically possible the intellectual progress of the mass and not only of small intellectual groups B, from the subaltern group to the intellectual-moral bloc, How? A struggle of political hegemonies One, the separation of theory and practice(or the contradictory consciousness Tivo, feeling being different (independent ):"consciousness of being part of a particular hegemonic force(that is, political consciousnes Three, progressive self-consciousness(a real possession of a single and coherent conception of the world), the unity of theory and practice Four: historically. it means the create of an elite of intellectuals P 334 Critical self-consciousness means, historically and politically, the creation of an elite of intellectuals. A human mass' does not distinguish itself, does not become independent in its own right without, in the widest sense, organizing itself; and there is no organization without intellectuals, that is, without organizers and leaders, in other words, without the theoretical aspect of the theory-practice nexus being distinguished concretely by the existence of a group of people ' spec ialised'in conceptual and philosophical elaboration of ideas Five, the parties and the dialectic between the intellectuals and the mass The dialectics between the intellectuals and the mass P 334-335 the intellectual stratum develops both quantitatively and qualitatively, but every leap forward towards a new breadth and complexity of the intellectual stratum is tied to an analogous movement on the part of the mass of the simple, who raise themselves to higher levels of culture and at the same time extend their circle of influence towards the stratum of specialized intellectuals, producing outstanding individuals and groups of greater or less importance PARTIES P335"For this reason, one can say that the parties are the elaborator of new integral and totalitarian intelligentsias and the crucibles where the un ification of theory and practice, understood as a real historical process, takes place PARTIES: elaborator of the elite intellectuals, the clear conception, a precise and decisive will Three, the Theory of Hegemony 1,civil society and hegemony4 the need for contact between intellectuals and simple it is not in order to restrict scientific activity and preserve unity at the level of the masses, but precisely to construct an intellectual-moral bloc which can make politically possible the intellectual progress of the mass and not only of small intellectual groups.” B, from the subaltern group to the intellectual-moral bloc, How? A struggle of political hegemonies: One, the separation of theory and practice (or the contradictory consciousness) Two, feeling being different (independent): “consciousness of being part of a particular hegemonic force(that is, political consciousness)” Three, progressive self-consciousness (a real possession of a single and coherent conception of the world); the unity of theory and practice Four, historically, it means the create of an elite of intellectuals P 334“Critical self-consciousness means, historically and politically, the creation of an elite of intellectuals. A human ‘mass’ does not distinguish itself, does not become independent in its own right without, in the widest sense, organizing itself; and there is no organization without intellectuals, that is, without organizers and leaders, in other words, without the theoretical aspect of the theory-practice nexus being distinguished concretely by the existence of a group of people ‘specialised’ in conceptual and philosophical elaboration of ideas” Five, the parties and the dialectic between the intellectuals and the mass The dialectics between the intellectuals and the mass: P 334-335 “the intellectual stratum develops both quantitatively and qualitatively, but every leap forward towards a new breadth and complexity of the intellectual stratum is tied to an analogous movement on the part of the mass of ‘the simple’, who raise themselves to higher levels of culture and at the same time extend their circle of influence towards the stratum of specialized intellectuals, producing outstanding individuals and groups of greater or less importance.” PARTIES: P335 “For this reason, one can say that the parties are the elaborators of new integral and totalitarian intelligentsias and the crucibles where the unification of theory and practice, understood as a real historical process, takes place.” PARTIES: elaborators of the elite intellectuals, the clear conception, a precise and decisive will Three, the Theory of Hegemony 1, “civil society” and hegemony