正在加载图片...
760 stroop task.Ne inlucate nd IOR-OT Campbell,K.L Grady,C.L.Ng.C.Hasher,L.(2012).Age ereat potential as a relible and obiective inde for assess ing cognitive functions of older individuals arach Np s0.212- Castel,A.D.Chasteen,A.LScialfa,C&Pratt,2003).Adul Supplementary Material age diffe return.Tb -759.doi 10. Sciences online. Cerella,J.(1985).Information processing rates in the cl doi:10.10370033 Funding Davidson,D.JZacks,R.T&Williams,C.C.(2003).Stroop inter 10.85-98 4-10 107 carch of a det doe10.375813414015-083S-3e 7,1647-1654 Author Contributions ang,J.P,Tang,H.D.,Wang .J2014 ersion o data under the e and ing mild Alzheimer's disease and mild ognitive imnair Ding De eriatrie Cogiie Disorders,37223-231 g11T、a mini m eral Psychiatry,40.812 Acknowledgments R y Andel R A 018)The on m,k parameters and n00017S104 1021700Py Conflict of Interest vry.R.B..Mangun.G.R.(2014).Cognitite euroscience:The biology of the mind (4th ed.).New York The authors declare no conflict of interest. CCampbel Reference 016.0 964.doi10.1093r h043 the control of attention.In Ce way.A arrold.C E1.(2017 Kane,M.,Miy (Eds.).V Sciences and Social Sciences,72.1-6.doi:10.1093/geronb Hasher.L Stolzfus.ER..Zacks,R.T.Rypma,B.(1991).Age gbw108 and inhibition.of Experimental Psycology.Leaming Fu,I C0gt0m,17,163-169 doi:10.1037027 239317L16 ta.64.403-414 Hasher I Zacks R T (1988)Workin and aging:A revie ce of prodomal dementia? Ho R. doi10.1016S A oumal of Albeimer's Disease,40,177-189.doi: New York:Oxford University Press Hodges,J.R.(2013).Cognitive for clinicians.(in Ch s s Gauthier s 010) impairments in Alzheimers discase.mild cognitive impair 2nd Han China:Huzh (Ed ment and healthy aging:Effect of congruency proportion in a Technology Press (Original work published in 2007). general cognitive functions in older adults. Our findings indicate that attentional inhibition ability is a key factor influencing healthy cognitive aging, and IOR-OT may have great potential as a reliable and objective index for assess￾ing cognitive functions of older individuals. Supplementary Material Supplementary data is available at The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences online. Funding This work was supported by grants from National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 31471070 and 31271190) to Y. Ding and Z. Qu, and Leading Talents in BaiQianWan Project of Guangdong Special Support Program (No. 201626026) to Y. Ding. Author Contributions Y.  Ding conceived and designed the studies. L.  Wang, T.  Li, W. Huang, and C. Zhong performed the studies and analyzed the data under the supervision of Z.  Qu and Y.  Ding. L.  Wang and Y.  Zhen provided research materials; T.  Li, Z.  Qu, and Y.  Ding wrote the manuscript. T. Li and L. Wang contributed equally to the present study and should be considered as co-first authors. Acknowledgments The authors thank Cheng Li for his assistance in data collection and the Editor and Reviewers for their helpful comments. Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Reference Amieva, H., Phillips, L. H., Della Sala, S., & Henry, J. D. (2004). Inhibitory functioning in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain, 127, 949– 964. doi:10.1093/brain/awh045 Anderson, N. D., & Craik, F. I. (2017). 50 years of cognitive aging theory. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72, 1–6. doi:10.1093/geronb/ gbw108 Bao, Y., Zhou, J., & Fu, L. (2004). Aging and the time course of in￾hibition of return in a static environment. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 64, 403–414. Bayer, A., Phillips, M., Porter, G., Leonards, U., Bompas, A., & Tales, A. (2014). Abnormal inhibition of return in mild cognitive im￾pairment: Is it specific to the presence of prodromal dementia? Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 40, 177–189. doi:10.3233/ JAD-131934 Bélanger, S., Belleville, S., & Gauthier, S. (2010). Inhibition impairments in Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impair￾ment and healthy aging: Effect of congruency proportion in a stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 48, 581–590. doi:10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2009.10.021 Campbell, K. L., Grady, C. L., Ng, C., & Hasher, L. (2012). Age differences in the frontoparietal cognitive control network: Implications for distractibility. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2212– 2223. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.025 Castel, A. D., Chasteen, A. L., Scialfa, C. T., & Pratt, J. (2003). Adult age differences in the time course of inhibition of return. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, P256–P259. doi:10.1093/geronb/58.5.P256 Cerella, J. (1985). Information processing rates in the eld￾erly. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 67–83. doi:10.1037/0033- 2909.98.1.67 Davidson, D. J., Zacks, R. T., & Williams, C. C. (2003). Stroop inter￾ference, practice, and aging. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 10, 85–98. doi:10.1076/anec.10.2.85.14463 Dukewich, K. R., & Klein, R. M. (2015). Inhibition of return: A phe￾nomenon in search of a definition and a theoretical frame￾work. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 77, 1647–1658. doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0835-3 Fang, R., Wang, G., Huang, Y., Zhuang, J. P., Tang, H. D., Wang, Y., & Ren, R. J. (2014). Validation of the Chinese version of Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination-revised for screen￾ing mild Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 37, 223–231. doi:10.1159/000353541 Folstein, M. F., Robins, L. N., & Helzer, J. E. (1983). The mini-men￾tal state examination. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 812. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790060110016 Gamaldo, A. A., Sardina, A. L., Corona, R. T., Willingham, K., Migoyo, R. V., & Andel, R. A. (2018). The association between educational parameters and a cognitive screening measure in older blacks. International Psychogeriatrics, 30, 311–322. doi:10.1017/S1041610217001107 Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2014). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind (4th ed.). New York: Norton. Grady, C., Sarraf, S., Saverino, C., & Campbell, K. (2016). Age differ￾ences in the functional interactions among the default, frontopa￾rietal control, and dorsal attention networks. Neurobiology of Aging, 41, 159–172. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.02.020 Hasher, L., Lustig, C., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory mecha￾nisms and the control of attention. In Conway, A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. (Eds.). Variation in working memory (pp. 227–249). New York: Oxford University Press. Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E. R., Zacks, R. T., & Rypma, B. (1991). Age and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 163–169. doi:10.1037/0278- 7393.17.1.163 Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 22, 193–225. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041–9 Hodges, J. R. (2007). Cognitive assessment for clinicians (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Hodges, J. R. (2013). Cognitive assessment for clinicians. (in Chinese; Xiong, L., Liu, H., & Yang, Z. X. (Eds.), Trans. L. Zhou (Ed.), 2nd ed.). Wu Han, China: Huazhong University of Science & Technology Press (Original work published in 2007). 760 Journals of Gerontology: PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, Vol. 75, No. 4 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/75/4/753/5033575 by Southern Medical University user on 04 May 2022
<<向上翻页向下翻页>>
©2008-现在 cucdc.com 高等教育资讯网 版权所有