Their appeal,was categorically rejected by Mr Justice Flaux who concluded that that the words“as she was”in the first sentence of clause 11 are merely a necessary part of a sentence which is recording the obligation to deliver the vessel in the same condition as she was when inspected,that they say nothing about what the sellers'obligations are, either on inspection or delivery,as regards the quality of the vessel.Hence they do not and cannot exclude the implied term as to satisfactory quality under section 14(2)of SOGA.Their appeal, was categorically rejected by Mr Justice Flaux who concluded that that the words “as she was” in the first sentence of clause 11 are merely a necessary part of a sentence which is recording the obligation to deliver the vessel in the same condition as she was when inspected, that they say nothing about what the sellers’ obligations are, either on inspection or delivery, as regards the quality of the vessel. Hence they do not and cannot exclude the implied term as to satisfactory quality under section 14(2) of SOGA