34-7 The a, k four-vector The relationships indicated in Eqs. (34.17)and (34. 18)are very interesting, because these say that the new frequency w'is a combination of the old frequency and the old wave number k, and that the new wave number is a combination of the old wave number and frequency. Now the wave number is the rate of change of phase with distance, and the frequency is the rate of change of phase with time and in these expressions we see a close analogy with the Lorentz transformation of the position and time: if w is thought of as being like t, and k is thought of as being like x divided by c, then the new w will be like I, and the new k' will be like x'/c2. That is to say, under the Lorentz transformation w and k transform the way as do t and x. They constitute what we call a four-yector; when a quantity has four components transforming like time and space, it is a four-vector. Everything seems all right, then, except for one little thing we said that a four-vector has to have four components; where are the other two components We have seen that w and k are like time and space in one space direction, but not in all directions and so we must next study the problem of the propagation of light in three space dimensions, not just in one direction, as we have been doing up until now Suppose that we have a coordinate system, x, y, z, and a wave which is travel long and whose wavefronts are as shown in Fig. 34-11. The wavelength of the wave is A, but the direction of motion of the wave does not happen to be in the direction of one of the axes what is the formula for such a wave? The answer is clearly cos (ot -ks), where k= 2T/ and s is the distance along the direction of motion of the wave-the component of the spatial position in the direction of motion. Let us put it this way: if r is the vector position of a point in space, then s is r ek, where ek is a unit vector in the direction of motion. That is, s is just r cos(r, ek), the component of distance in the direction of motion Therefore our wave is cos(ot-kek r). Now it turns out to be very convenient to define a vector k, which is called the wave vector, which has a magnitude equal to the wave number 2T/, and is pointed in the direction of propagation of the waves k=2 (3419) Using this vector, our wave can be written as cos(ar-kr), or as cos(ot Fig. 34-11. A plane wave travelling k2x-k,,). What is the significance of a component of k, say kx? Clearly, k is the rate of change of phase with respect to x. Referring to Fig. 34-11, we see that the phase changes as we change x just as if there were a wave along x but of a longer wavelength. The"wavelength in the x-direction"is longer than a natural, true wavelength by the secant of the angle a between the actual direction of propagation and the x-axis Ar= A/cos a. Therefore the rate of change of phase, which is proportional to the reciprocal of ax, is smaller by the factor cos a; that is just how kx would vary--it would be the magnitude of k, times the cosine of the angle between k and the x-axis That, then, is the nature of the wave vector that we use to represent a wave in three dimensions. The four quantities a, kr, kys k, transform in relativity as a four-vector, where w corresponds to the time, and ka, ky, kr correspond to the x,y, and z-components of the four-vector In our previous discussion of special relativity(Chapter 17), we learned that there are ways of making relativistic dot products with four-vectors. If we use the position vector xu, where u stands for the four components(time and three space ones), and if we call the wave vector ku, where the index u again has four values. time and three space ones, then the dot product of xu and k, is written 2'k rp (see Chapter 17). This dot product is an invariant, independent of the coordinate system; what is it equal to? By the definition of this dot product in four dimensions, it Is kuy-k2 3421)