COMPARISON OF E-GLASS DATA WITH STATISTICAL THEORIES 513 TABLE I Fragment Evolution Pattern from PU04E03 Test Specimen 192.5378.712515.019921223.123.724.325.526.828.730.531.2 (breaks/cm) 20789813729.441249.064768.674.576578482486.392.2980100.0 Number of %o Strain 1421.491621.731.791952052262.372552993.163.283.623.784.174.41 Fragment no. Fragment lengths given in um 1016048606443971631163116311632793793446446446446 47347347347 508508508508508508508 508508 330330330330330330330330330330 2766956372 372372372372372372 584584584584584584584245245245 105710571057507507507507507507214214 550550550550550329329329329329 37237237237 2345678 16671667767767 767314314314314314314 314314 453453453453453453453237237 90054854854854854854854854854827127127 277277277 159715 56565333 23356789 232232232232 188118811881 731283283283283283283283283283283 448448448448448448448448448448 65066506230914061406603603603603603603299 491491491491491491 491 31231231231231231231231231231 903903 299299299299299299299299299299 604604604311311311311311311311 293293293 293293 4197 3331 28128 399399399 399399399399399399 538538 307307307 123555789 313www222i 406406406406 406406406 53653 22 852852852 76276276276276 577577577277277 300300 Plots of the average size of fragments surviving to specimens are shown in Figure 3. For the Bare2_9 saturation for the bare E-glass/DGEBA/m-PDa and NOTS_DI plots, one standard deviation error specimen(Bare 2_9), the bare E-Glass/polyisocyanu- bars are shown at the strain increments where multi- rate specimen(PU04E03), and the noTs_ DI Sfc ple fragments survived to saturation. For visual Journal of applied Polymer Science DOI 10.1002/ appPlots of the average size of fragments surviving to saturation for the bare E-glass/DGEBA/m-PDA specimen (Bare2_9), the bare E-Glass/polyisocyanu￾rate specimen (PU04E03), and the NOTS_D1 SFC specimens are shown in Figure 3. For the Bare2_9 and NOTS_D1 plots, one standard deviation error bars are shown at the strain increments where multi￾ple fragments survived to saturation. For visual TABLE I Fragment Evolution Pattern from PU04E03 Test Specimen Break density (breaks/cm) 0 1.9 2.5 3.7 8.7 12.5 15.0 19.9 21.2 23.1 23.7 24.3 25.5 26.8 28.7 30.5 31.2 % dc 2.0 7.8 9.8 13.7 29.4 41.2 49.0 64.7 68.6 74.5 76.5 78.4 82.4 86.3 92.2 98.0 100.0 Number of fragments 1 4 5 7 15 21 25 33 35 38 39 40 42 44 47 50 51 % Strain 1.42 1.49 1.62 1.73 1.79 1.95 2.05 2.26 2.37 2.55 2.99 3.16 3.28 3.62 3.78 4.17 4.41 Fragment no. Fragment lengths given in lm 10 16048 6064 4397 1631 1631 1631 1632 793 793 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 11 347 347 347 347 347 347 347 347 12 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 13 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 330 14 2766 956 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 15 584 584 584 584 584 584 584 584 584 245 245 245 16 339 339 339 17 1057 1057 1057 507 507 507 507 507 507 214 214 214 214 18 293 293 293 293 19 550 550 550 550 550 329 329 329 329 329 20 221 221 221 221 221 21 753 753 753 381 381 381 381 381 381 381 381 381 381 22 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 372 23 1667 1667 767 767 767 767 314 314 314 314 314 314 314 314 314 24 453 453 453 453 453 453 453 237 237 25 216 216 26 900 548 548 548 548 548 548 548 548 548 271 271 271 27 277 277 277 28 352 352 352 352 352 352 352 352 352 352 352 352 29 1597 1597 1597 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 30 1246 681 681 681 329 329 329 329 329 329 329 329 329 31 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 351 32 565 565 565 565 565 565 333 333 333 333 333 333 33 232 232 232 232 232 232 34 1881 1881 1881 458 458 458 458 458 458 458 458 458 458 458 458 458 35 692 692 692 692 692 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 36 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 37 731 283 283 283 283 283 283 283 283 283 283 283 283 38 448 448 448 448 448 448 448 448 448 448 209 209 39 239 239 40 6506 6506 2309 1406 1406 603 603 603 603 603 603 299 299 299 299 299 41 304 304 304 304 304 42 491 491 491 491 491 491 491 491 491 491 491 43 312 312 312 312 312 312 312 312 312 312 312 44 903 903 903 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 45 604 604 604 311 311 311 311 311 311 311 46 293 293 293 293 293 293 293 47 4197 680 281 281 281 281 281 281 281 281 281 281 281 281 48 399 399 399 399 399 399 399 399 399 399 399 399 49 3517 1185 647 341 341 341 341 341 341 341 341 341 341 50 307 307 307 307 307 307 307 307 307 307 51 538 538 538 538 538 538 538 538 538 538 275 52 263 53 2331 1479 536 536 536 536 536 536 536 305 305 305 54 231 231 231 55 406 406 406 406 406 406 406 406 406 406 56 536 536 536 536 536 536 240 240 240 240 57 296 296 296 296 58 852 852 852 276 276 276 276 276 276 276 276 59 577 577 577 577 577 577 277 277 60 300 300 COMPARISON OF E-GLASS DATA WITH STATISTICAL THEORIES 513 Journal of Applied Polymer Science DOI 10.1002/app