正在加载图片...
New Practitioners Forum al, the incident may require the academic 2. Rabi SM, Patton LR, Fjortoft N et al. Melissa S. Medina, Ed D, Presidential misconduct board to meet, hear the case, Professor and assistant Dean for and render a decision of academic Assessment and evaluation Summary Cheating can occur in the Educ. 20 duc. 2006; 70: article 73 classroom or experiential setting and, 3. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy University of Oklahoma onsequences for the future professional guide lin es for th e adr life of the student and his or her patients gra m in phar may leading to the docter po. Bx zh to newal Avenue It is important to note that the examples accredit. org/pdf/ACPE_Revised_PharmD_ First Floor, Room 125 Standards_Adopted_Jan152006doc ma City, OK 73190 vite cheating through their test creation, 4. Austin z. Collins D. Remillard a et al. melissa-medinaceouhsc edu administration, and method. Faculty nfluence of attitudes toward curriculum Director of Preparing Future Faculty must be proactive and make every at on dishonest academic behavior. Am J Graduate College tempt to prevent cheating by document- 5. Ryan G, Bonanno H, Krass I et al University of Oklahoma ing clear and consistent expectations, Undergraduate and postgraduate phar-WeiC.Yuet,Pharm.DCandidate policies, and consequences in their sylla macy students' perceptions of plagiarism bus and maintain a secure environment d academic honesty. Am/ Pharm Educ. University of oklahoma during assessments in order to uphold 6. Rovai ap online and traditional assess. academic integrity nents: what is the difference? Internet The authors have declared no potential High educ.20003:141-51. inflicts of interest. 1.Hardigan PC. First-and third-year phar- 7. Medina MS, Medina Ph, Wanzer DS et al. macy students'attitudes toward cheating Use of an audience response system(ARS) behaviors. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004; 68: ar- dual-campus environment. Am/ DOI 102146/ajhp120 ticle 110 Pharm Educ. 2008: 72: 38 Am J Health-Syst Pharm-Vol 70 May 1, 2013 757New Practitioners Forum Am J Health-Syst Pharm—Vol 70 May 1, 2013 757 al, the incident may require the academic misconduct board to meet, hear the case, and render a decision. Summary. Cheating can occur in the classroom or experiential setting and, regardless of the setting, can have dire consequences for the future professional life of the student and his or her patients. It is important to note that the examples herein are just a few ways faculty may in￾vite cheating through their test creation, administration, and method. Faculty must be proactive and make every at￾tempt to prevent cheating by document￾ing clear and consistent expectations, policies, and consequences in their sylla￾bus and maintain a secure environment during assessments in order to uphold academic integrity. 1. Hardigan PC. First- and third-year phar￾macy students’ attitudes toward cheating behaviors. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004; 68:ar￾ticle 110. 2. Rabi SM, Patton LR, Fjortoft N et al. Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006; 70:article 73. 3. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional pro￾gram in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree, 2007. www.acpe￾accredit.org/pdf/ACPE_Revised_PharmD_ Standards_Adopted_Jan152006.doc (accessed 2012 Nov 26). 4. Austin Z, Collins D, Remillard A et al. Influence of attitudes toward curriculum on dishonest academic behavior. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006; 70:article 50. 5. Ryan G, Bonanno H, Krass I et al. Undergraduate and postgraduate phar￾macy students’ perceptions of plagiarism and academic honesty. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009; 73:article 105. 6. Rovai AP. Online and traditional assess￾ments: what is the difference? Internet High Educ. 2000; 3:141-51. 7. Medina MS, Medina PJ, Wanzer DS et al. Use of an audience response system (ARS) in a dual-campus environment. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008; 72:38. Melissa S. Medina, Ed.D., Presidential Professor and Assistant Dean for Assessment and Evaluation College of Pharmacy University of Oklahoma University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center 1110 North Stonewall Avenue P.O. Box 26901 First Floor, Room 125 Oklahoma City, OK 73190 melissa-medina@ouhsc.edu Director of Preparing Future Faculty Graduate College University of Oklahoma Wei C. Yuet, Pharm.D. Candidate College of Pharmacy University of Oklahoma The authors have declared no potential conflicts of interest. DOI 10.2146/ajhp120598
<<向上翻页
©2008-现在 cucdc.com 高等教育资讯网 版权所有