The principle itself is one of disintegration,and upon which no government can possibly endure. If all the States,save one,should assert the power to drive that one out of the Union,it is presumed the whole class of seceder politicians would at once deny the power,and denounce the act as the greatest outrage upon State rights.But suppose that precisely the same act,instead of being called "driving the one out,''should be called "the seceding of the others from that one,''it would be exactly what the seceders claim to do;unless,indeed,they make the point,that the one,because it is a minority,may rightfully do,what the others,because they are a majority, may not rightfully do.These politicians are subtle,and profound,on the rights of minorities.They are not partial to that power which made the Constitution,and speaks from the preamble,calling itself "We,the People..’ It may well be questioned whether there is,to-day,a majority of the legally qualified voters of any State,except perhaps South Carolina,in favor of disunion.There is much reason to believe that the Union men are the majority in many,if not in every other one,of the so-called seceded States.The contrary has not been demonstrated in any one of them.It is ventured to affirm this,even of Virginia and Tennessee;for the result of an election,held in military camps,where the bayonets are all on one side of the question voted upon,can scarcely be considered as demonstrating popular sentiment.At such an election,all that large class who are,at once,for the Union,and against coercion,would be coerced to vote against the Union. It may be affirmed,without extravagance,that the free institutions we enjoy,have developed the powers,and improved the condition,of our whole people,beyond any example in the world.Of this we now have a striking, and an impressive illustration.So large an army as the government has now on foot,was never before known,without a soldier in it,but who had taken his place there,of his own free choice.But more than this:there are many single Regiments whose members,one and another,possess full practical knowledge of all the arts,sciences,professions,and whatever else,whether useful or elegant,is known in the world;and there is scarcely one,from which there could not be selected,a President,a Cabinet,a Congress,and perhaps a Court,abundantly competent to administer the government itself.Nor do I say this is not true,also, in the army of our late friends,now adversaries,in this contest;but if it is,so much better the reason why the government,which has conferred such benefits on both them and us,should not be broken up.Whoever,in any section,proposes to abandon such a government,would do well to consider,in deference to what principle it is,that he does it---whatThe principle itself is one of disintegration, and upon which no government can possibly endure. If all the States, save one, should assert the power to drive that one out of the Union, it is presumed the whole class of seceder politicians would at once deny the power, and denounce the act as the greatest outrage upon State rights. But suppose that precisely the same act, instead of being called "driving the one out,’’ should be called "the seceding of the others from that one,’’ it would be exactly what the seceders claim to do; unless, indeed, they make the point, that the one, because it is a minority, may rightfully do, what the others, because they are a majority, may not rightfully do. These politicians are subtle, and profound, on the rights of minorities. They are not partial to that power which made the Constitution, and speaks from the preamble, calling itself "We, the People.’’ It may well be questioned whether there is, to-day, a majority of the legally qualified voters of any State, except perhaps South Carolina, in favor of disunion. There is much reason to believe that the Union men are the majority in many, if not in every other one, of the so-called seceded States. The contrary has not been demonstrated in any one of them. It is ventured to affirm this, even of Virginia and Tennessee; for the result of an election, held in military camps, where the bayonets are all on one side of the question voted upon, can scarcely be considered as demonstrating popular sentiment. At such an election, all that large class who are, at once, for the Union, and against coercion, would be coerced to vote against the Union. It may be affirmed, without extravagance, that the free institutions we enjoy, have developed the powers, and improved the condition, of our whole people, beyond any example in the world. Of this we now have a striking, and an impressive illustration. So large an army as the government has now on foot, was never before known, without a soldier in it, but who had taken his place there, of his own free choice. But more than this: there are many single Regiments whose members, one and another, possess full practical knowledge of all the arts, sciences, professions, and whatever else, whether useful or elegant, is known in the world; and there is scarcely one, from which there could not be selected, a President, a Cabinet, a Congress, and perhaps a Court, abundantly competent to administer the government itself. Nor do I say this is not true, also, in the army of our late friends, now adversaries, in this contest; but if it is, so much better the reason why the government, which has conferred such benefits on both them and us, should not be broken up. Whoever, in any section, proposes to abandon such a government, would do well to consider, in deference to what principle it is, that he does it---what