/956 (1)The work also found that when the eyes went in the direction of the target,its latency was significantly slower than when the eyes went in the direction of the distractor (237 vs 213 ms). >suggesting that the saccade to the target is initiated later than the saccade to the distractor. (2)Those fixation durations after the first saccade (>90%trials,<150 ms)are too short to allow the programming of a new eye movements (e.g., Henderson Ferreira 1990) (1)+(2)>two eye movements were programmed in parallel......(see next page...) (1) The work also found that when the eyes went in the direction of the target, its latency was significantly slower than when the eyes went in the direction of the distractor (237 vs 213 ms).  suggesting that the saccade to the target is initiated later than the saccade to the distractor .  (2) Those fixation durations after the first saccade (>90% trials, <150 ms) are too short to allow the programming of a new eye movements (e.g., Henderson & Ferreira 1990)  (1)+(2)  two eye movements were programmed in parallel……(see next page…)