Company Law加 Europe and European Company Law Eddy Wymeersch Abstract This paper addresses some of the issues underlying the harmonisation of company lany in Europe, especially in its relationship with companmy lany developments in the member states It highlights that until now company law has attempted to engage in substantive harmonisation, and less in solving cross-border issues involving company establishment By doing so, it has led to a pattern of cross border establishment that, being essentially based on the formation of subsidiaries under more or less comparable legal systems, less efficient than if the companies in europe had been allowed to freely and efficientl establish themselves under the form of branches. It also allows to situate the substantive harmonisation activity as a form of restricting the competitive forces in the company law field. By stressing substantive harmonisation, regulatory arbitrage has been stifled leading to less flexibility without reducing the need for rules on the cross-border aspects of the company activity. Some recent developments are analysed, dealing with the SLIM report, the 14th predraft on the cross-border transfer of the seat, and the proposed rules on the european company statute Comments to the author eddy. wymeersch @rug. ac be C Financial law institute. Universiteit Gent. 2001 e Financial Law institute. Universiteit Gent 2001© Financial Law Institute, Universiteit Gent, 2001 Company Law in Europe and European Company Law Eddy Wymeersch Abstract This paper addresses some of the issues underlying the harmonisation of company law in Europe, especially in its relationship with company law developments in the Member states. It highlights that until now company law has attempted to engage in substantive harmonisation, and less in solving cross-border issues involving company establishment. By doing so, it has led to a pattern of cross border establishment that, being essentially based on the formation of subsidiaries under more or less comparable legal systems, is less efficient than if the companies in Europe had been allowed to freely and efficiently establish themselves under the form of branches. It also allows to situate the substantive harmonisation activity as a form of restricting the competitive forces in the company law field. By stressing substantive harmonisation, regulatory arbitrage has been stifled leading to less flexibility without reducing the need for rules on the cross-border aspects of the company activity. Some recent developments are analysed, dealing with the SLIM report, the 14th predraft on the cross-border transfer of the seat, and the proposed rules on the European company statute. Comments to the Author: eddy.wymeersch@rug.ac.be © Financial Law Institute, Universiteit Gent, 2001