数学中国w, madio,net Judges Commentary 173 a very creative and interesting paper! This team notes improvement in the U.S. system but could improve through changes to"prevention, treatment, and access"components of healthcare Conclusion The judges extend their congratulations to all who participated in the con- test. The submissions represented not only a variety of approaches that teams used to model the problem, but also a variety of approaches to analyzing the results obtained by the model. Reading your submissions was an enjoyable activity. As judges, we will be excited to see both the types of problems that you approach and the creativity that you use as interdisciplinary modelers after you complete your studies Recommendations for Future Participants Whenideas, assumptions, modeling concepts, and other aspects of the prob. lem are clearly explained, it is easier to separate work that is outstanding from work that is just good. Aim to communicate your ideas clearly and Address all aspects of the problem that are asked. Omitting questions that are asked in the problem statement will not result in a submission that is competitive Simple explanations are usually better than complicated ones. Both clar- ity and brevity in explanations are preferred to explanations that are long rambling, and sometimes confusing It is important to cite precise sources for work or words that are not your own. Material taken from other sources must be thoroughly documented and placed in quotation marks. The selection of an appropriate modeling approach is critical, but using the model to analyze the problem and present recommendations is often more important than the model itself. Teams should spend time not only in developing the model but in using it to obtain recommendations, analyze different scenarios, and perform sensitivity analysis The recommendations that you make to decision makers should stem from your model. They should not simply be the result of Internet research or other sources that are independent of your modeL. Team members should work to integrate their final submissions. The judges should not able to distinguish clear in communicationor-worse- identify uonuadicting information in purtiuns uf the paper that were written by different team members数学中国 www.madio.net