Build up a serious attitude to sciencell! I absolutely do not agree with Waston et al. at the points described 3rd 4th paragraphs on page 235 1. What are the more reasonable explanations for the 10-10 mutation frequency in living organisms? 2. What are the evidences that such a low mutation rate can drive the evolvement of a new species if the cell changes are known harmful?Build up a serious attitude to science!!! I absolutely do not agree with Waston et al. at the points described 3rd & 4th paragraphs on page 235 1. What are the more reasonable explanations for the 10-10 mutation frequency in living organisms? 2. What are the evidences that such a low mutation rate can drive the evolvement of a new species if the cell changes are known harmful?