HARVARD LAW REVIEW VOL. X MARCH 25, 1897. NO.8. THE PATH OF THE LAW ThEN we study law we are not studying a mystery but a well known profession. We are studying what we shall want in order to appear before judges, or to advise people in such a way as to keep them out of court. The reason why it is a pro- fession, why people will pay lawyers to argue for them or to advise them, is that in societies like ours the command of the public force is intrusted to the judges in certain cases, and the whole power of the state will be put forth, if necessary, to carry out their judg. ments and decrees. People want to know under what circum- stances and how far they will run the risk of coming against what is so much stronger than themselves, and hence it becomes a busi- ness to find out when this danger is to be feared. TI ect of our study, then, is prediction, the prediction of the incidence of the public force through the instrumentality of the courts. The means of the study are a body of reports, of treatises, and of statutes, in this country and in England, extending back for six hundred years, and now increasing annually by hundreds. In these sibylline leaves are gathered the scattered prophecies of the past upon the which the axe will fall. These are what properly have been called the oracles of the law. Far the most important and pretty nearly the whole meaning of every new effort of legal thought is to make these prophecies more precise, and to An Address delivered by Mr Justice Holmes, Court of massachusetts, at the dedication of the new hall Law, on January 8, 1897. Copyrighted by O. w.HARVARD LAW REVIEW. VOL. X. MARCH 25, 1897. No. 8. THE PATH OF THE LAW.1 W HEN we study law we are not studying a mystery but a well known profession. We are studying what we shall want in order to appear before judges, or to advise people in such a way as to keep them out of court. The reason why it is a pro￾fession, why people will pay lawyers to argue for them or to advise them, is that in societies like ours the command of the public force is intrusted to the judges in certain cases, and the whole power of the state will be put forth, if necessary, to carry out their judg￾ments and decrees. People want to know under what circum￾stances and how far they will run the risk of coming against what is so much stronger than themselves, and hence it becomes a busi￾ness to find out when this danger is to be feared. The object of our study, then, is prediction, the prediction of the incidence of the public force through the instrumentality of the courts. The means of the study are a body of reports, of treatises, and of statutes, in this country and in England, extending back for six hundred years, and now increasing annually by hundreds. In these sibylline leaves are gathered the scattered prophecies of the past upon the cases in which the axe will fall. These are what properly have been called the oracles of the law. Far the most important and pretty nearly the whole meaning of every new effort of legal thought is to make these prophecies more precise, and to 1 An Address delivered by Mr. Justice Holmes, of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, at the dedication of the new hall of the Boston University School of Law, on January 8, I897. Copyrighted by 0. W. Holmes, I897