Krupka and Weber Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games 505 基的 59383 供片世代禽蕾盛著 $墨些罩南器器图 供登等的驾盛等馨鲨置 信费黄装出咨等世坐其 孕释将得稻 生西8月 房学学爵等器学拳普 Aling Jol ((D)N 房牌墨紫道生常黄背鉴塑 潜紫牌背背母 菌道器号营些芝芒胃 得解稻格 店8首 8方路房月 Krupka and Weber Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games 505 TABLE 1. Elicited norms (N(ak)) for bully versus standard dictator environments (data from Experiment 1). Standard (n = 107) (Initial wealth: $10, $0) Bully (n = 92) (Initial wealth: $5, $5) Action Rank-sum (final wealth) Action Mean –– – + ++ Action Mean –– – + ++ test (z) $10, $0 “Give $0” −0.80 82% 10% 3% 5% “Take $5” −0.90 91% 5% 0% 3% 1.85∗ $9, $1 “Give $1” −0.64 61% 31% 3% 6% “Take $4” −0.83 82% 14% 1% 3% 3.13∗∗∗ $8, $2 “Give $2” −0.44 35% 51% 10% 4% “Take $3” −0.67 55% 40% 3% 1% 3.27∗∗∗ $7, $3 “Give $3” −0.16 8% 62% 26% 4% “Take $2” −0.38 28% 53% 16% 2% 3.34∗∗∗ $6, $4 “Give $4” 0.14 3% 30% 61% 7% “Take $1” −0.09 12% 46% 36% 7% 3.42∗∗∗ $5, $5 “Give $5” 0.87 0% 3% 14% 83% “Give $0” / 0.93 0% 0% 11% 89% 1.26 “Take $0” $4, $6 “Give $6” 0.57 0% 7% 50% 43% “Give $1” 0.48 4% 12% 40% 43% 0.72 $3, $7 “Give $7” 0.42 1% 22% 39% 37% “Give $2” 0.31 7% 23% 38% 33% 1.12 $2, $8 “Give $8” 0.32 6% 31% 23% 40% “Give $3” 0.20 14% 27% 23% 36% 1.08 $1, $9 “Give $9” 0.22 17% 24% 19% 40% “Give $4” 0.10 27% 16% 21% 31% 0.99 $0, $10 “Give $10” 0.18 26% 13% 18% 43% “Give $5” 0.04 36% 10% 16% 38% 1.13 ∗p < 0.1; ∗∗p < 0.05; ∗∗∗p < 0. 01; all two-tailed. Responses are: “very socially inappropriate” (– –), “somewhat socially inappropriate” (–), “somewhat socially appropriate” ( +), “very socially appropriate” (+ +); modal response are shaded. To construct the mean ratings, we converted responses into numerical scores (“very socially inappropriate” = –1, “somewhat socially inappropriate” = –1/3, “somewhat socially appropriate” = 1/3, “very socially appropriate” = 1)