KIM et al: CYCLIC FATIGUE OF BRITTLE CERAMICS Pn generic form [47, 48 K(c)=do(tc)/Fc) where c is the crack dimension measured along the downward crack coordinate s and F(c) is a dimen sionless Greens function, with F< I for any dimin ishing tensile field as(c)< oo at s >0. Suppose now that the indenter is subject to some time-dependent contact load P(n. Assume that a ring crack initiates from a surface flaw of character istic size cr and begins to extend downward accord attain instability by writing u=dc/dr in equation and co th ions(2)and (3) Ro 0 dc/le/FOn Static load SIze c= cF at time I= Ie for cone crack pop-in is determinable from the 0 limiting equilibrium condition K= To in equation (3). Since the extension to depth cF is generally Multi-cycle 10c small compared to the final con we regard this phase of the crack evolution as initiation In the special case of periodic loading to pea load P over n cycles at frequency f, corresponding Fig. 1. Schematic of Hertzian contact of radius r and n cycles at load P. Beyond ith wc to an indentation time I=n/f, equation(4)reduces threshold load. damage consists of ks. surface ring radius Ro plus, under severe loading conditions, sub- (nPN)=[(N) Ro/G(N )uo(2n/RS/To/(1-2v)1 un over n normal contacts at frequency ests, and static loading over prescribed hold times I, are also run where subscript c denotes critical number of cycles Ie to pop-in at fixed P; or, alternatively, critical load p at fixed n. The G and h terms are dimen- sionless integrals [10 D=L0(K/70)(K<To) G(N)= [P(o/P] d(n where To(Ke)is the single-value material toughness defining the upper limit of the velocity range, and N and o are velocity exponent and coefficient, re- H(N)= d(c/Ro)/(c/Ro)Fc/Ro).(6b) spectively. We consider two stages in the kinetic rack evolution in relation to the ensuing strength Equation (5) degradation properties: initiation, determining the ing relative to threshold load at which strength undergoes an initiation in single-cycle contact, i.e. P=Pi at sequent continued strength loss at post-threshold n= 1: 2. 2. Cone crack initiation. The radial tensile stress do acting at the surface coordinate ro of a ne=(P1/P)(fixed P (7b) prospective cone crack from contact with a sphere of radius r at load P(Fig. 1)for a material of pois- The quantity Pi has the functional form sons ratio v is [46 IC,N, Do, Ro, To, v). We will obtain an explicit re- lation for this function in Section 5. Strictly, PI o=1-2)P/RG (2)also depends on cr and ce, but these dependencies are small because of the stabilizing effect of the The corresponding stress-intensity factor has the diminishing stress field in cone initiation, such thatfunction u u0
K=T0 N
K < T0
1 where T0 (Kc) is the single-value material toughness de®ning the upper limit of the velocity range, and N and u0 are velocity exponent and coecient, respectively. We consider two stages in the kinetic crack evolution in relation to the ensuing strength degradation properties: initiation, determining the threshold load at which strength undergoes an abrupt strength loss; propagation, determining subsequent continued strength loss at post-threshold loads. 2.2.1. Cone crack initiation. The radial tensile stress s0 acting at the surface coordinate R0 of a prospective cone crack from contact with a sphere of radius r at load P (Fig. 1) for a material of Poisson's ratio n is [46] s0 1 2
1 ÿ 2nP=pR2 0:
2 The corresponding stress±intensity factor has the generic form [47, 48] K
c s0
pc 1=2 F
c
3 where c is the crack dimension measured along the downward crack coordinate s and F(c) is a dimensionless Greens function, with F < 1 for any diminishing tensile ®eld ss
c < s0 at s > 0. Suppose now that the indenter is subject to some time-dependent contact load P0
t. Assume that a ring crack initiates from a surface ¯aw of characteristic size cf and begins to extend downward according to equation (1). We may solve for the time to attain instability by writing u dc=dt in equation (1) and combining with equations (2) and (3): u0
1 ÿ 2n=2p1=2 R2 0T0 N
tc 0 P 0
tN dt
cF cf dc=c1=2 F
cN
4 where the instability crack size c cF at time t tc for cone crack pop-in is determinable from the limiting equilibrium condition K T0 in equation (3). Since the extension to depth cF is generally small compared to the ®nal cone crack size, we regard this phase of the crack evolution as ``initiation''. In the special case of periodic loading to peak load P over n cycles at frequency f, corresponding to an indentation time t n=f, equation (4) reduces to
nP Nc H
N fR0=G
N u02p1=2 R3=2 0 T0=
1 ÿ 2nN
5 where subscript c denotes critical number of cycles nc to pop-in at ®xed P; or, alternatively, critical load Pc at ®xed n. The G and H terms are dimensionless integrals [10] G
N
1 0 P 0
ft=P N d
ft
6a H
N
cF=R0 cf =R0 d
c=R0=
c=R0 1=2 F
c=R0N:
6b Equation (5) may be further reduced by normalizing relative to the value of critical load for cone initiation in single-cycle contact, i.e. P P1 at n 1: Pc P1=n1=N
fixed n
7a nc
P1=P N
fixed P:
7b The quantity P1 has the functional form P1
f, N, u0, R0, T0, n. We will obtain an explicit relation for this function in Section 5. Strictly, P1 also depends on cf and cF, but these dependencies are small because of the stabilizing eect of the diminishing stress ®eld in cone initiation, such that Fig. 1. Schematic of Hertzian contact test, with WC sphere of radius r and n cycles at load P. Beyond threshold load, damage consists of cone cracks, surface ring radius R0; plus, under severe loading conditions, subsurface quasi-plastic deformation zone. Cyclic fatigue tests are run over n normal contacts at frequency f. Comparative single-cycle tests, and static loading tests over prescribed hold times t, are also run. KIM et al.: CYCLIC FATIGUE OF BRITTLE CERAMICS 4713