DAVIDV. MYERS Summary un: Component Analysis and Analysis of variance G Direction ariabic DiT::e b Variabie Loaded[ Cum D: ferene i Physical proximity Distent EA<ED B ArrEsten: Reiative height 4. force fields Yoar: g< older 6. Arm i xtensions Young nicer :, Deserint: on of Action: ELI! IV VIE Ac:ustment EA<ED s Satety o: Figures EA<ED I. Rotations FA<ED YOung <oer Toling old ! :4. Bottom lining Adi:stment EA<ED Adjustmen: 46. Eieaasutali t Juristen: EA<ED :?. ideea placement Adus:nien: EA<ED :8. Easi Li HIL.ViI EA<ED 冫9. Nimber ot meme;s Auiusizrent FA<ED C Back Placement fore shouid not be automatically accepted ferentia: information. since these variables as indicators of emot onal disturbance, aiso loaded on components that differ particularly when scored by the present entiated bet: the emotionally well scoring procedure. The presen: evidence ad:usted and the emotionally distur bed suggests :hat these three variables in com- groups. O: the remaining six variables bination with the other variables of Com- four: i.t. Relative Height. Erasures. tn ponent v, bear little reiationship to emo. declining Figures, and Back Placemen: tional ad ustment Safety of Figures and did not load highly on any of the compo Shading. the remaining varia bies ioac: nents which were associated with s:gn!: high:y on Component V provided no dif- cant di: ferences among the groups. Th