look for search words at sentence level mis-hits, as demonstrated in example sentence 4, are included. [2] (4-E) Two major areas of concern about the proposal were considered by the Committee (4G) Der AusschuB befaBte sich mit zwei wichtigen Aspekten des Vorschlags, die er fur problematisch hielt. As can be seen, CONSIDER is actually translated as BEFASSEN(single underlining), whereas HALTEN refers to of concern'(bold underlining) 50 concordance lines, every n-th occurrence, of CONSIDER with a specific tE were nitially investigated. For example, from the 1, 730 lines of CONSIDER with the TE halten 50 lines were extracted and transformed into active canonical clauses without adjuncts as demonstrated in example sentence 5 (5-E) Our airport is very close to housing and, like 20% of Europe citizens. we suffer levels of noise from aircraft which health experts consider to be unacceptable Transformation (5a-E) Health experts consider the levels of noise from aircraft to be unacceptable Unser Flughafen liegt ganz in der Nahe der Wohngebiete, und wie 20% der europaischen Burger leiden wir unter einer Fluglarmbelastung, die Gesundheitsexperten fur untragbar halten Transformatio (5a-G) Gesundheitsexperten halten die Fluglarmbelastigung fur These 50 transformed lines were then analysed for the syntactic patterns of the original and the te (figure 1) s时dwru-lnf 而5/心印 sub tintes or ange wws sustance 30we ans der t ogp perot booted the daoting posad 0d k wh e nch fwer ngebrocte stpengscnworhweustwoien 11565Dms fa recen assi o ltm me aar Geme'nshuftbeiuoe Cer Rat hec es her wondo, des D ooo torturer swr过 anear re emghekse her on sgre0cmn度键 set Le se wondered EtN ausschuss ro ovenden TYe cdos oer c Arrse a豳m部操出q的 Fone Erucunso wo 6a0IWr Autem ei er nawng see heme pecifener zubehareelr s山 b es adj wb dos 153oeh hate es fuer chhg, auss oe Massnwhm 24 leone ered it toper Do soumo ow the new Commas 0o see wbem 轴 rites fuer ncre oass von滑MDw00 122WN彩的画钟峰6的过的智的 Figure 1. Extract from valency comparison of CONSIDER and the TE HALTEN The question which arises at this point of the investigation is whether 50 concordance lines are sufficient to produce reliable and viable find ings. For this reason, a further three sets of 50 concordance lines were analysed for the two most frequent TEs of CONSIDER, ViZ. HALTEN and BETRACHTEN. As can be seen in Table 2, the frequent patterns for a te of CONSIDER are the same in all four data sets, although the rank order changes slightly between the sets. Therefore, it seems sufficient to work with 50 concordance lines, especially given that the remainder of the tEs are less frequent than5 look for search words at sentence level mis-hits, as demonstrated in example sentence 4, are included. [2] (4-E) Two major areas of concern about the proposal were considered by the Committee. (4-G) Der Ausschuß befaßte sich mit zwei wichtigen Aspekten des Vorschlags, die er für problematisch hielt. As can be seen, CONSIDER is actually translated as BEFASSEN (single underlining), whereas HALTEN refers to ‘of concern’ (bold underlining). 50 concordance lines, every n-th occurrence, of CONSIDER with a specific TE were initially investigated. For example, from the 1,730 lines of CONSIDER with the TE HALTEN 50 lines were extracted and transformed into active canonical clauses without adjuncts as demonstrated in example sentence 5. (5-E) Our airport is very close to housing and, like 20% of Europe’s citizens, we suffer levels of noise from aircraft which health experts consider to be unacceptable. Transformation: (5a-E) Health experts consider the levels of noise from aircraft to be unacceptable. (5-G) Unser Flughafen liegt ganz in der Nähe der Wohngebiete, und wie 20% der europäischen Bürger leiden wir unter einer Fluglärmbelastung, die Gesundheitsexperten für untragbar halten. Transformation: (5a-G) Gesundheitsexperten halten die Fluglärmbelästigung für untragbar. These 50 transformed lines were then analysed for the syntactic patterns of the original and the TE (figure 1). Figure 1. Extract from valency comparison of CONSIDER and the TE HALTEN The question which arises at this point of the investigation is whether 50 concordance lines are sufficient to produce reliable and viable findings. For this reason, a further three sets of 50 concordance lines were analysed for the two most frequent TEs of CONSIDER, viz. HALTEN and BETRACHTEN. As can be seen in Table 2, the frequent patterns for a TE of CONSIDER are the same in all four data sets, although the rank order changes slightly between the sets. Therefore, it seems sufficient to work with 50 concordance lines, especially given that the remainder of the TEs are less frequent than