This sex which Is Not One Commodities among Themselves Not a word has been said here abot m Exchanges without identifiable terms,.without accounts; Neither the girl's nor Freud's. Indeed, the"patient without en Without additions and accumulations, one/v ompletely indifferent to the treatment process, although her us one. woman after woman Without sequence or as consi number. Without standard or yardstick. Red blood and sham ransference was Freud's? A negative transference, as they say. Or would no longer be differentiated-by deceptive envelopes con- lenegational. For how could he possibly have identified himself cealing their worth(Use and exchange ould be indistinguisha with a"lady".. who moreover was"of bad repute sexu ble. The greatest value would be at the same time the least kept aly”a"“ cocotte;”" someone who" lived simply by giving her in reserve. Nature's resources would be expended without de- dily favours"(p. 161)? How could his"superego"have per- pletion, exchanged without labor, freely given, exempt from mitted him to be"quite simply""a woman? Still, that would masculine trar without a fee, well-being have been the only way to avoid blocking his "patients without pain, pleasure without possession. As for all the strat- transfere egies and savings, the appropriations tantamount to theft and rape, the laborious accumulation of capital, how ironic all that hoa nacosrst. The V So female homosexuality has eluded psychoanalys would be is not to say that Freud's description dominant sociocultural economy leaves female he Utopia? Perhaps. Unless this mode of exchange has unde only a choice between a sort of animality that Freud seems to mined the order of commerce from the beginning-while the i overlook and the/imitation of male rodels. In this economy any necessity of keeping incest in the realm of pure pretense has stood in interplay of desire among womens"bodies, women's organs, the way of a certain economy of abundance wone s language is inconceivable And yet female homosexuality does exist. But it is recog- nized only to the extent that it is prostituted to man's fantasies v Commodities can only entem into relations auestion for watchful eyes of their guardians. "It is out of the them to go to on their own, enjoy their own wort mong themselves, speak to each other, desire each other, free from the control of seller-buyer-consumer subjects. And the iterests of businessmen require that commodities relate to ead other as rivals But what if these"commodities"refused to go to"market"? Wha they maintained <another" kind of commerce, among