STATE OF THE WORLDS FORESTS 2003 BROADER IMPLICATIONS FOR REFERENCES FINANCING OF SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT Barany, M, Hammett, A C, Sene, A& Amichev, B In the global debate about financing sustainable 2001. Non-timber forest benefits and HIV/ AIDS in forest management, emphasis is being placed on sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Forestry, 99(12) increasing domestic and private, rather than international and public, financing(UN, 2000). FAO. 1983. Forest revenue systems in developing The results of the analysis presented in this countries, by J.w. Gray. FAO Forestry Paper No. 43 chapter suggest that there is little chance that either of these objectives will be met in afric FAO. 2001, 2002. The forest revenue system and in the near future, given that the region is one gouernment expenditure on forestry in .. 32 country of the least equipped to address such reports. Forest Finance Working Paper series challenges Rome(alsoavailableatwww.faoorg/forestry/ There is a great difference between develope and developing countries with regard to the FAO. 2002a. Fiscal policies in the context of national practice of sustainable forest management, forest programmes in Africa. Proceedings of the EC- largely because of the disparity in income, FAO Workshop, Abuja, 13-16 November 2001 which in turn affects the levels of available public and private financing. Although FAO, 2002b. AIDS. a threat to rural africa. fact sheet forestry's share of total public expenditure FaoFocus.Rome(availableatwww.fao.org probably very similar in both categories, in focus/e/aids/aids6-ehtm). absolute terms it is negligible in developing Grut, M, Gray, J w.& Egli, N. 1991. Forest pricing countries because of much lower public d concession policies: managing the high forests of spending. If there is a genuine desire to West and Central Africa. World Bank Technical implement sustainable forest management on a Paper No 143. Washington, DC, World Bank. arge scale across many developing countries, ILO. 2000. HIV/AIDS in Africa: the impact on the world then international financing for the public sector of work. Africa Development Forum 2000,Addis will have to increase Ababa, Ethiopia, 3-7 December 2000. Geneva, The extent to which sustainable forest Switzerland, International Labour Organization management can be financed from private ources depends very much on the profitability IME. 2000. Nigeria: statistical appendix IMF Staff of the sector. In the few countries in africa with Country Report No 00/06. Washington, DC, significant and well-developed private International Monetary Fund (IMf)(also available erations (e. g. in West African countries and atwww.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/ South Africa), it may be possible to encourage the private sector to finance a significant Madhvani, A. 1999. An assessment of data on ODA proportion of the investment needed for this financial flows in the forest sector. Paper prepared for purpose. However, in most countries, the UNDP Forest Policy and Environment Gro production comes mainly from small-scale and London, Overseas Development Institute informal producers or from people harvesting National Statistical Office, Malawi. 2000. The forest products for their own use, so it is Malawi National gemini MSE Baseline Survey 2000 unrealistic to expect them to finance sustainable availableatwww.nso.malawi.net/dataonline forest management to any great extent.It economics/gemini/gemini. html) therefore seems likely that the public sector will OECD. 2000. Official development assistance to continue to have an important role 1973-98. Paper prepared for the 4th session of the implementing sustainable forest management Intergovernmental Forum on Forests. Paris, and will remain its most important source of France, Organisation for Economic Co-operation nd Development (OECD2003 FORESTS S’WORLD THE OF STATE 120 FOR IMPLICATIONS BROADER FOREST SUSTAINABLE OF FINANCING MANAGEMENT sustainable financing about debate global the In on placed being is emphasis, management forest than rather, private and domestic increasing .(2000, UN (financing, public and international this in presented analysis the of results The that chance little is there that suggest chapter Africa in met be will objectives these of either one is region the that given, future near the in such address to equipped least the of .challenges developed between difference great a is There the to regard with countries developing and ,management forest sustainable of practice ,income in disparity the of because largely available of levels the affects turn in which Although. financing private and public is expenditure public total of share s’forestry in, categories both in similar very probably developing in negligible is it terms absolute public lower much of because countries to desire genuine a is there If. spending a on management forest sustainable implement ,countries developing many across scale large sector public the for financing international then .increase to have will forest sustainable which to extent The private from financed be can management profitability the on much very depends sources with Africa in countries few the In. sector the of private developed-well and significant and countries African West in. g.e (operations encourage to possible be may it), Africa South significant a finance to sector private the this for needed investment the of proportion ,countries most in, However. purpose and scale-small from mainly comes production harvesting people from or producers informal is it so, use own their for products forest sustainable finance to them expect to unrealistic It. extent great any to management forest will sector public the that likely seems therefore in role important an have to continue management forest sustainable implementing of source important most its remain will and ◆ .financing REFERENCES .B, Amichev. & A, Sene., C.A, Hammett., M, Barany in AIDS/HIV and benefits forest timber-Non. 2001 :(12(99, Forestry of Journal. Africa Saharan-sub .41–36 developing in systems revenue Forest. 1983. FAO .43. No Paper Forestry FAO. Gray. W.J by, countries .Rome and system revenue forest The. 2002, 2001. FAO country 32 .... in forestry on expenditure government .series Paper Working Finance Forest. reports /forestry/org.fao.www at available also (Rome .(finance national of context the in policies Fiscal. 2002a. FAO –EC the of Proceedings. Africa in programmes forest .2001 November 16–13, Abuja, Workshop FAO .Rome .sheet Fact. Africa rural to threat a: AIDS. 2002b. FAO /org.fao.www at available (Rome. Focus FAO .(htm.e-aids6/aids/e/focus pricing Forest. 1991. N, Egli. & W.J, Gray., M, Grut of forests high the managing: policies concession and Technical Bank World. Africa Central and West .Bank World, DC, Washington. 143. No Paper world the on impact the: Africa in AIDS/HIV. 2000. ILO Addis, 2000 Forum Development Africa. work of ,Geneva. 2000 December 7–3, Ethiopia, Ababa Organization Labour International, Switzerland .(ILO( Staff IMF. appendix statistical: Nigeria. 2000. IMF ,DC, Washington. 06/00. No Report Country available also) (IMF (Fund Monetary International /cat/pubs/external/org.imf.www at .(0.3393=sk?cfm.longres ODA on data of assessment An. 1999. A, Madhvani for prepared Paper. sector forest the in flows financial .Group Environment and Policy Forest UNDP the .Institute Development Overseas, London The. 2000. Malawi, Office Statistical National .2000 Survey Baseline MSE Gemini National Malawi /line_on_data/net.malawi.nso.www at available( .(html.gemini/gemini/economics forestry to assistance development Official. 2000. OECD the of session 4th the for prepared Paper. 98–1973 ,Paris. Forests on Forum Intergovernmental operation-Co Economic for Organisation, France .(OECD (Development and