4.R. David, Sravnitelnoye Pravovedeniye(Pravoviye Systemy Sovremennosti ). Moskva, 1967 5. I. Szabo, Sravnitelnoye Pravovedeniye (Kritika Sovremennoy Burjuaznoy Teorii Prava) Moskva, 1969, p. 166 6. A.A. Tille and G.V. Shvekov, Sravnitelniy Metod v Juridicheskikh Naukakh. Moskva Izdatelstvo'Wysshaya Shkola, 1978, p. 65 7. R. Sacco, Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law(Instalment I of Il) American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol 39, 1991, pp 4-5 8. G. Samuel, Comparative Law and Jurisprudence, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol.47,1998,p.817 9. M. Ancel, Metodologicheskiye Problemy Sravnitelnogo Prava, in Ocherki Sravnitelnogo Prava ed V.A. Tumanov. Moskva, Izdatelstvo Progress, 1981, pp 39-40 10. M.N. Marchenko, Sravnitelnoye Pravovedeniye. Obshaya Chast. Moskva, Izdatelstvo Zertsalo, 2001, pp. 77-79 11. M. Rheinstein, Teaching Tools in Comparative Law: A Book Survey, American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 1, 1952, pp 95-114 12. A H. Saidov, Sravnitelnoye Pravovedeniye(Osnovniye Pravoviye Systemy Sovremennosti) Moskva, 2000, p. 25 13. Y.A. Tikhomirov, Kurs Sravnitelnogo Pravovedeniya. Moskva, 1996, pp 30-31; H.E. Chodosh Comparing Comparisons: In Search of Methodology, lowa Law Review, VoL 84, pp. 1046-1052 K. Zweigert and H. Kotz, vvedeniye v Sravnitelnoye Pravovedeniye v Sphere Chastnogo Prava Vol. 1, loskva, 2000, pp. 68-69 14. Saidov, op cit, P. 24 15. V.S. Nersesyants, Sravnitelnoye Pravovedeniye v Systeme Jurisprudentsii, Gosudarstvo Pravo, Vol. 4, 2001, pp. 5-1 16. W. Ewald, Comparative Jurisprudence(I): What Was It Like to Try a Rat, Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 143, 1995, p. 2115 17. M.A. Glendon, M.W. Gordon and Ch Osakwe, Comparative Legal Traditions. St Paul, Min 1994,pp.7-8 18 M. Bogdan, Comparative Law. Kluwer/Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik/Oslo: TANO, 1994, pp4. R. David, Sravnitelnoye Pravovedeniye (Pravoviye Systemy Sovremennosti). Moskva, 1967. 5. I. Szabo, Sravnitelnoye Pravovedeniye (Kritika Sovremennoy Burjuaznoy Teorii Prava). Moskva, 1969, p. 166. 6. A.A. Tille and G.V. Shvekov, Sravnitelniy Metod v Juridicheskikh Naukakh. Moskva, Izdatelstvo 'Vysshaya Shkola', 1978, p. 65. 7. R. Sacco, Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law (Instalment I of II), American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 39, 1991, pp. 4-5. 8. G. Samuel, Comparative Law and Jurisprudence, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 47, 1998, p. 817. 9. M. Ancel, Metodologicheskiye Problemy Sravnitelnogo Prava, in Ocherki Sravnitelnogo Prava, ed. V.A. Tumanov. Moskva, Izdatelstvo 'Progress', 1981, pp. 39-40. 10. M.N. Marchenko, Sravnitelnoye Pravovedeniye. Obshaya Chast. Moskva, Izdatelstvo 'Zertsalo', 2001, pp. 77-79. 11. M. Rheinstein, Teaching Tools in Comparative Law: A Book Survey, American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 1, 1952, pp. 95-114. 12. A.H. Saidov, Sravnitelnoye Pravovedeniye (Osnovniye Pravoviye Systemy Sovremennosti). Moskva, 2000, p. 25. 13. Y.A. Tikhomirov, Kurs Sravnitelnogo Pravovedeniya. Moskva, 1996, pp. 30-31; H.E. Chodosh, Comparing Comparisons: In Search of Methodology, Iowa Law Review, Vol. 84, pp. 1046-1052; K. Zweigert and H. Kötz, Vvedeniye v Sravnitelnoye Pravovedeniye v Sphere Chastnogo Prava. Vol. 1, Ìoskva, 2000, pp. 68-69. 14. Saidov, op. cit., p. 24. 15. V.S. Nersesyants, Sravnitelnoye Pravovedeniye v Systeme Jurisprudentsii, Gosudarstvo i Pravo, Vol. 4, 2001, pp. 5-15. 16. W. Ewald, Comparative Jurisprudence (I): What Was It Like to Try a Rat, Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 143, 1995, p. 2115. 17. M.A. Glendon, M.W. Gordon and Ch. Osakwe, Comparative Legal Traditions. St. Paul, Minn., 1994, pp. 7-8. 18. M. Bogdan, Comparative Law. Kluwer/Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik/Oslo: TANO, 1994, pp