21-25; I Winterton, Comparative Law Teaching, American Journal of Comparative Law, 1975,p 19.R. H.S. Tur, The Dialectic of General Jurisprudence and Comparative Law, Juridical Review 1977, p. 249; W.J. Kamba, Comparative Law: A Theoretical Framework, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 23, 1976, p. 494 20. E. Orucil Critical Comparative Law: Considering Paradoxes for Legal Systems in Transition, Comparative Vol. 4.1. June 2000 <http://law.kubnl/ejcl/41/art41-1.htmi> 21. O. Pfersmann, Le droit compare comme interpretation et comme theorie du droit, Revue international de droit compare, Vol 53, 2001, pp. 275-288 22 Marchenko, op. cit, p. 79 23. P Legrand, How to Compare Now, Legal Studies, Vol 16, 1996, p. 23221-25; Ì. Winterton, Comparative Law Teaching, American Journal of Comparative Law, 1975, p. 71. 19. R.H.S. Tur, The Dialectic of General Jurisprudence and Comparative Law, Juridical Review, 1977, p. 249; W.J. Kamba, Comparative Law: A Theoretical Framework, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 23, 1976, p. 494. 20. E. Örücü, Critical Comparative Law: Considering Paradoxes for Legal Systems in Transition, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 4.1, June 2000, <http://law.kub.nl/ejcl/41/art41-1.html>. 21. O. Pfersmann, Le droit comparé comme interprétation et comme théorie du droit, Revue international de droit comparé, Vol. 53, 2001, pp. 275-288. 22. Marchenko, op. cit., p. 79. 23. P. Legrand, How to Compare Now, Legal Studies, Vol. 16, 1996, p. 232