2013年5月 妇女研究论丛 May.2013 第3期总第117期 Collection of W om en's Studies No.3 Ser.No.117 论夫妻财产权的平等保护 对婚姻法司法解释的社会性别分析 彭艳崇 (澳门理工学院社会经济与公共政策研究所，澳门999078) 关键词：夫妻财产权：平等：社会性别：司法解释婚烟法 摘要：夫妻财产权的平等保护是婚姻法中的一项重要原则。婚姻法司法解释按照财产权的规则对夫妻财产和个人财产进 行界分，实行平均分割和同等保护，以指导和解决司法适用中出现的新问题。然而，从社会性别的视角看，司法解释的这一中立 立场，同样忽略了女性在家庭和社会现实生活中的不利处境和地位，并不能有效保护处于弱势的女性财产权益。因此，司法实践 中不能孤立简单地适用司法解释，而要回归到婚姻法确立的相关原则中，在夫妻财产权的司法保护上走向实质平等和公正。 中图分类号：D923.9 文献标识：A 文章编号：1004-2563(2013》03-003407 EqualProtection of the Property R ights of the H usband and the W ife:G ender A nalysis of the Judicial Interpretations of the M arriage Law ofChina PENG Y an-chong (Center of Research on Social,Economic and Public Policy at Macau Polytechnic Institute,Macau 999078.China) K ey w ords:the property rights of the husband and the w ife,equality,gender,jdicial interpretation,m amiage law A bstact:The equal protection of the property rights of the husband and the w ife is a m ain principle in m arriage law.A ccording to the principle of property rights,the jdicial interpretations of the M arriage Law distingu ish the property shared by the husband and the w ife from personalproperty rights,giving equaldiv ision and protection to the fom er,in order to guide the resolution of em erging issues in the application of the Law.H ow ever,from a gender perspective,this paper argues that the above jidicial in terpretations,w hich appear to hold a gender neutralstand ing,have actually overboked w om en's disadvantaged position in the fam ily and society,one thathas pre- vented w om en from protecting their property rights effectively.Therefore,the jidges should not rule sim ply based on the above jidicial interpretations.They should observe the relative principls and regulations of the M arriage Law,and uphold jstice and equity to pro- vide the needed protection to w om en in actual jidicialdeliveries 作为人格权的延伸，享有财产权意味着拥有个 了夫妻双方平等的身份关系，而且规定了夫妻财产 人自由和人格尊严，无财产即无人格。法律对财 权的平等保护。通过婚姻法的三个司法解释，最高法 产的保护并非仅仅对物的保护，说到底是对人的保 院对实践中夫妻财产和个人财产界分和确权，但是 护。作为男女平等权利的法律保护，婚烟法不仅规定 这些便于司法审判的解释都引起社会的广泛热议。 作者简介：彭艳崇(1975-)，男，澳门理工学院社会经济与公共政策研究所客座副教授、博士。 34 ?1994-2015 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House.All rights reserved.http://www.cnki.net妇女研究论丛 Collection of Women’s Studies 2013 年 5 月 第 3 期 总第 117 期 May. 2013 No.3 Ser.No.117 作为人格权的延伸，享有财产权意味着拥有个 人自由和人格尊严，无财产即无人格。[1](P46)法律对财 产的保护并非仅仅对物的保护，说到底是对人的保 护。作为男女平等权利的法律保护，婚姻法不仅规定 了夫妻双方平等的身份关系，而且规定了夫妻财产 权的平等保护。通过婚姻法的三个司法解释，最高法 院对实践中夫妻财产和个人财产界分和确权，但是 这些便于司法审判的解释都引起社会的广泛热议。 论夫妻财产权的平等保护 ——对婚姻法司法解释的社会性别分析 彭艳崇 （澳门理工学院 社会经济与公共政策研究所，澳门 999078） 作者简介：彭艳崇（1975-），男，澳门理工学院社会经济与公共政策研究所客座副教授、博士。 关键词：夫妻财产权；平等；社会性别；司法解释;婚姻法 摘 要：夫妻财产权的平等保护是婚姻法中的一项重要原则。婚姻法司法解释按照财产权的规则对夫妻财产和个人财产进 行界分，实行平均分割和同等保护，以指导和解决司法适用中出现的新问题。然而，从社会性别的视角看，司法解释的这一中立 立场，同样忽略了女性在家庭和社会现实生活中的不利处境和地位,并不能有效保护处于弱势的女性财产权益。因此，司法实践 中不能孤立简单地适用司法解释，而要回归到婚姻法确立的相关原则中，在夫妻财产权的司法保护上走向实质平等和公正。 中图分类号：D923.9 文献标识：A 文章编号：1004-2563（2013）03-0034-07 Equal Protection of the Property Rights of the Husband and the Wife: Gender Analysis of the Judicial Interpretations of the Marriage Law of China PENG Yan-chong (Center of Research on Social, Economic and Public Policy at Macau Polytechnic Institute, Macau 999078, China) Key words: the property rights of the husband and the wife, equality, gender, judicial interpretation, marriage law Abstract: The equal protection of the property rights of the husband and the wife is a main principle in marriage law. According to the principle of property rights, the judicial interpretations of the Marriage Law distinguish the property shared by the husband and the wife from personal property rights, giving equal division and protection to the former, in order to guide the resolution of emerging issues in the application of the Law. However, from a gender perspective, this paper argues that the above judicial interpretations, which appear to hold a gender-neutral standing, have actually overlooked women's disadvantaged position in the family and society, one that has pre￾vented women from protecting their property rights effectively. Therefore, the judges should not rule simply based on the above judicial interpretations. They should observe the relative principles and regulations of the Marriage Law, and uphold justice and equity to pro￾vide the needed protection to women in actual judicial deliveries. 34