论硏究一般数据来源多样、内涵丰富,容易得出新的概念;但同时,扎根理论硏究往往更加依赖硏究者本 人的经验与知识积累,要求研究者在描述和解释问题时参阅更多领域的文献。在结论可信度方面,扎根 理论硏究不像量化研究有较为明晰的信度和效度指标,研究结论是否被接受也要受到读者个人经验和 知识的影响。比如,判定“扎根理论硏究所建构的理论是否饱和”的依据,目前一般认为是“新收集到的 数据不能产生新的理论内涵”,因为新收集到的数据不能产生新的理论内涵这说明理论已经饱和,但无 法进行精准的判定,未来研究应该设法开发相关的判断标准 主要参考文献: l]Suddaby, R From the editors: W hat ground theory is not[ J]. Academy of M anagement JournaL 2006. 49(4): 633-642. I 2 Glaser, B G and Strauss A L The dis covery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative researcH M]. New York: Aldine. 1967. I 3 Gersick, C J G. Time and tran siti ork teams: T ow ard a new mode in group developmen( J). Academy of Management Jour naL198831(1):9-41. [4 Margolis. J D. and M minsky. A. Navigating the bind of necessary evils: Psy chologic sonally sensitive behavior J). Academy of M anagem ent JournaL 2008 51(5):847-872 [5]Sutton, R I. The process of organizat ional death: Disbanding and reconnecting J. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987, 32(4) 542-56 6 Miles, M B, and Huberman. A M. Qualitative data analy si! M]. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications 1984 [7 Isabella. L A. Evolving in terpretations as change unfolds: How managers construe key organizati onal event J. Academy of Man gement Jou rnaL 1990. 33(1):7-41 [8 Brow ning. L D Beyes J M. and Shetler JC. Building cooperation in a competitive in dustry: SEM ATECH and the semiconductor industryl J). Academy of M an agement Jou m al 1995. 38( 1): 113-151 [9 AlimoM etcalfe B, and AlbarrM etcalfe R J. The development of a new trans format ional leadership quest ionnaire J]. Journal of Occupation al and Organizational Psychology. 2001. 74(1): 1-27. [10 Uzzi. B Social structure and competition inin terfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness J). Adminis trative Science Quar rly,1997.42(1):35-67. [Il] Straus s A, and Corbin. J. Basics of qu ali tative reseach: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory(2nd Ed IMJ. Thou sand Oaks CA: Sage Publications. 1998. [12] M art in P Y and Turnes B A Grounded theory and organizational res earch[ J- Jou rnal of A pplied Behavioral Science 1986 (2)2141-157 [13]K rppendorff K Content analysis: An in troduction to its methodology(2nd Ed. ) I M]. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications. 2003. [14 Glaser. B G Basics of grounded theory analysis M]. Mill Valley. CA: Sociology Press 1992. [15jpandiT,nR.ThecreationoftheoryArecentapplicationofthegroundedtheorymethodEbol.http://www.novaeu/ssss/ 16 Orlik owski W J and Yates J Gen re repertoire: The struct uring of communicative practices in oganizations J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994. 39(4): 541-574 17] Erickson. R J and Ritter. C. Emotional labor. bu mout and inau thenticity: Does gender matter?[ JJ. Social Psychology Quarterly,200l,64(2):146-163. impressions of organization al ju st[ A]. in Staw, B M. and Cum mings L L (Eds ) Research in o ganizational behavior C. Greenwich CT: JAI Press 1990: 111-157 (责任编辑:谷化) 1890外济点管理第3卷第12)onicPublishingHouse.alLrightsreservedhttp:/www.cnki.net外国经济与管理(第 32 卷第 12 期) 论研究一般数据来源多样 、内涵丰富,容易得出新的概念;但同时 ,扎根理论研究往往更加依赖研究者本 人的经验与知识积累 ,要求研究者在描述和解释问题时参阅更多领域的文献。在结论可信度方面 ,扎根 理论研究不像量化研究有较为明晰的信度和效度指标 ,研究结论是否被接受也要受到读者个人经验和 知识的影响。比如, 判定“扎根理论研究所建构的理论是否饱和”的依据 ,目前一般认为是“新收集到的 数据不能产生新的理论内涵” ,因为新收集到的数据不能产生新的理论内涵这说明理论已经饱和 ,但无 法进行精准的判定, 未来研究应该设法开发相关的判断标准 。 主要参考文献: [ 1] S uddaby , R.From the editors:What groun ded th eory is not[ J] .Academy of Management Journal, 2006 , 49(4):633-642. [ 2] Gl aser , B G , and Strauss, A L .Th e dis covery of grounded theory :Strategies f or qualitative research[ M] .New York:Aldine .1967. [ 3] Gersick ,C J G .Time and tran siti on in w ork team s:T ow ard a new model in group developmen t[ J] .Academy of Management Jou r￾nal, 1988 , 31(1):9-41. [ 4] Margolis , J D , and M olinsky , A .Navigating the bin d of necessary evils :Psy chological en gagemen t and the production of in terper￾s onally sensiti ve b ehavior[ J] .Academ y of M anagem en t Journal, 2008 , 51(5):847-872 [ 5] S utt on , R I .The process of organizational death:Disbanding and reconnecting[ J] .Administrative Science Qu art erly , 1987 , 32(4): 542-569. [ 6] Miles , M B , and Hub erman , A M .Qualit ative dat a analy sis[ M] .Beverly Hills, CA :S age Publi cation s, 1984. [ 7] Isabella , L A.Evol ving in terpretations as change unf olds:How managers constru e key organizati onal events[ J] .Academy of Mana￾gement J ou rnal, 1990 , 33(1):7-41. [ 8] Brow ning , L D, Beyer, J M , and Shetler, J C .Building cooperation in a competitive in dustry :SEM ATEC H and th e semicondu ct or industry[ J] .Academy of Man agemen t Jou rn al, 1995 , 38(1):113-151. [ 9] Alimo-M et calf e, B , and Alban-M et calf e, R J.The developmen t of a new transformational leadership questionnaire[ J] .Journal of Occupati on al and Organizati onal Psychology , 2001 , 74(1):1-27. [ 10] Uzzi, B .Social structu re and competiti on in in terfirm n etw orks:The paradox of embeddedness[ J] .Administrative Science Quar￾t erly , 1997 , 42(1):35-67. [ 11] S trauss, A , and Corbin , J.Basi cs of qu alitative research:Techniques and procedures f or developing grounded theory(2nd Ed.) [ M] .Th ou sand Oaks, CA :Sage Publi cations , 1998. [ 12] M artin , P Y, and Tu rner, B A .Grounded theory and organizational res earch[ J] .J ou rnal of Applied Behavi oral S cience, 1986 , 22 (2):141-157. [ 13] K rip pendorff, K .Con tent analysis:An in troducti on to its methodology(2 nd Ed.)[ M] .Thousand Oaks, C A:Sage Publi cation s, 2003. [ 14] Glaser , B G .Basi cs of grounded th eory analysis[ M] .Mill Valley , CA :Sociology Press, 1992. [ 15] Pandit , N R.T he creation of th eory :A recent ap plicati on of the grounded theory meth od[ EB/ OL] .http:// w w w .n ova .edu/ ssss/ QR/ QR2-4/ pandit.h tml . [ 16] Orlik ow s ki, W J, and Yat es, J.Gen re repert oire:The structuring of communi cative practi ces in o rganizations[ J] .Administrative S cience Quart erly , 1994 , 39(4):541-574. [ 17] Erickson , R J, and Ritter , C .Emotional labor , bu rn ou t, and inau th enticity :Does gender matt er ? [ J] .S ocial Psych ology Quarterly , 2001 , 64(2):146-163. [ 18] Greenberg , J.Looking f air vs.b eing fair :Managing impressi on s of organizati on al ju stice[ A] .in S t aw , B M , and Cum mings, L L (Eds.).Research in o rganizational behavi or[ C] .G reenwi ch , C T :JAI P ress, 1990:111-157. (责任编辑 :谷 化) 18