Part 3:Writing an Argument (40 points) Question 12: Marking Guidelines Reasonably free from errors,substantial length,well- 36-40 constructed,relevant ideas,all the main arguments Excellent presented with adequate examples,good use of complex sentence forms,appropriate choice of words and structures. A few errors,but not too intrusive to reader's understanding,reasonable length,relevant ideas,main 32-35 Very good arguments covered,but possibly some examples or information missing,few errors in complex sentence forms, few errors in control of structure and words. Reader can follow the argument,but a little interference from errors of structure and choice of words,few errors in 25-31 Good subject/verb agreement,most of main arguments presented,a little irrelevant information or lack of relevant examples,control of simple sentence structure,but errors in complex sentences. Ideas can be followed without too much difficulty on the part of the reader,argument lacks some coherence,a few 24 Pass errors of structure and choice of words are intrusive,control only of simple sentence forms,errors in subject/verb agreement. Difficult to follow ideas,argument weakly presented,some 16-23 Weak errors even in simple sentence formation,errors in structure and vocabulary are many and are somewhat intrusive. Errors in structure and vocabulary prevent much 0-15 Very poor understanding of the message,serious errors in sentence formation,arguments not well presented. Here is a sample essay: Mass media such as books,plays and films exert considerable impact upon people's life in the modern society.However,many people are arguing whether books,plays and films should be censored before the release.In my view,strict censorship should be established to eliminate the potential misuse of these media. First of all,people are not always able to tell what is right or wrong from what is 149Part 3: Writing an Argument (40 points) Question 12: larking Guidelines Reasonably free from errors, substantial length , we11- 36-40 Excellent constructed , relevant ideas, a11 the 1am arguments presented with adequate examples, good use of complex sentence forms , appropriate choice of words and structures. A few errors, but not too intrusive to reader' s understanding , reasonable length , relevant ideas, main 32-35 Very gωd arguments covered , but possibly so 1e examples or information missing , few errors in complex sentence forms , few errors in control of structure and words. Reader can fo11ow the argument , but a little interference from errors of structure and choice of words, f ew errors in 25-31 Good subject/verb agreement , 10st of mam arguments presented , a little irrelevant information or lack of relevant examples, control of simple sentence structure , but errors in complex sentences. Ideas can be fo11owed without too much difficulty on the part of the reader , argument lacks some coherence , a few 24 Pass errors of structure and choice of words are intrusive , control only of simple sentence forms , errors in subject/verb agreement. Difficult to fo11ow ideas, argument weakly presented , some 16-23 Weak errors even in simple sentence formation , errors in structure and vocabulary are many and are somewhat intrusive. Errors m structure and vocabulary prevent much 。一 15 Very poor understanding of the message , serious errors in sentence formation , arguments not well presented. Here is a sample essay: Mass media such as books, plays and films exert considerable impact upon people's life in the modern society. However, many people are arguing whether books, plays and films should be censored before the release. In my view , strict censorship should be established to eliminate the potential misuse of these media. First of a11 , people are not always able to tell what is right or wrong from what is 149