and that the objections are quite strong. Rowe's own view is that were wrong to grant Anselm that God is a possible being, i.e., to claim that it is not even possible for there to be an absolutely perfect being. But the argument for this is unconvincing. Note that the failure of the ontological argument does not show that God doesn,'t exist; nor does it show that there aren't good reasons to believe in God It is just one argument. It also provides us much to think about in the way of existence. etcand that the objections are quite strong. Rowe's own view is that we're wrong to grant Anselm that God is a possible being, i.e., to claim that it is not even possible for there to be an absolutely perfect being. But the argument for this is unconvincing. Note that the failure of the ontological argument does not show that God doesn't exist; nor does it show that there aren't good reasons to believe in God. It is just one argument. It also provides us much to think about in the way of existence, etc