2)If lying is wrong then Clinton shouldn 't have lied about his affair with Monica 3)Clinton shouldn 't have lied about his affair According to non-cognitivism, (1)does not express a proposition that is truth-apt. What about the same utterance in(2)? Can we plausibly interpret both occurrences of"lying is wrong"in the same way? How are we to understand the inference?(Note that the validity of the inference seems to depend on the truth of (1)and the conditional (2). but if(1) neither true nor false, and the antecedent in(2 )is neither true nor false, how are we to evaluate the inference? iv)How should we interpret occurrences of 'good, ' right, wrong, etc in various other contexts? If good functions equivalently to an exclamation like"hurrah", then should we accept the following interpretations Do what is good. A Do what is Hurrah! Hurrah for good people! A Hurrah for Hurrah people! considered do better in capturing/explaining the point or purpose of morality? es at all? Do any of the views we've 1. What do you think is the point of morality? Why do societies have moral code 2. What are we looking for, exactly, in a moral theory? What is moral theory attempting to accomplish? Do any of the views we've considered do better than others in accomplishing this?2) If lying is wrong, then Clinton shouldn't have lied about his affair with Monica. 3) Clinton shouldn't have lied about his affair. According to non-cognitivism, (1) does not express a proposition that is truth-apt. What about the same utterance in (2)? Can we plausibly interpret both occurrences of "lying is wrong" in the same way? How are we to understand the inference? (Note that the validity of the inference seems to depend on the truth of (1) and the conditional (2). But if (1) is neither true nor false, and the antecedent in (2) is neither true nor false, how are we to evaluate the inference?) iv) How should we interpret occurrences of 'good', 'right', 'wrong', etc. in various other contexts? If good functions equivalently to an exclamation like "hurrah", then should we accept the following interpretations: Do what is good. Å Do what is Hurrah! Hurrah for good people! Å Hurrah for Hurrah people! Questions: 1. What do you think is the point of morality? Why do societies have moral codes at all? Do any of the views we've considered do better in capturing/explaining the point or purpose of morality? 2. What are we looking for, exactly, in a moral theory? What is moral theory attempting to accomplish? Do any of the views we've considered do better than others in accomplishing this?