J Buder, C Schwind/Computers in Human Behavior 28(2012)207-216 in educational contexts. Though some applications are aroun Buunk, B P, Collins, R L, Taylor, S E, van Yperen, N w,& Dakof, G.A.(1990). Th many of them do not move beyond a prototype develo pment. ffective consequences of social comparison: Either direction has its ups and Implementation studies would typically be case studies or experi- downs. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1238-1249. doi: 10. 1037/ ments with atool vS no tool "condition. Second, we need more Cai, x, Bain, M, Krzywicki, A, Wobcke, w Kim, Y S, Compton, P et al.(2011). pplied experimental research that varies boundary condition twor but keeps technology constant. For instance, it would be interes ing to see how one and the same recommender system works with Cialdini, R B (2001). Influence: Science and practice(4th ed. )Boston, MA: Allyn different tasks, or different learners with different learning styles and different proficiency levels. This would help illuminating the Cohen, E. G.( 1994) Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small doi:10.3102 potentials and the limitations of educational recommender sys- tems And third, we need more research on the basic psychological Cosley. D. Lam,S K Albert, L, Konstan, J.A.& Riedl (2003) Is seeing believing? mechanisms that are addressed when learners use a recommender Korhonen (Eds h. Proceedings of the ACM CH/ Cons opinions. In G. Cockton system. For instance, our own empirical work on the effectiveness Computing Systems (pp 585-592) New York, NY: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/ of preference-inconsistent recommendations, while not employing 611.642713 a full-blown recommender system, can be regarded as a step to- Cronbach, LJ.& Snow, R.E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook wards uncovering the psychological dynamics that specific types Dawes, R M (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31.169-193 Technologies need to have an added value in order to become De wit. FRC, Greer, LL. 2008. The black-box deciphered: meta-analysis of tea incorporated in everyday learning settings. Technologies must make us capable of accomplishing things that are impossible to Dillard, en, L(2005) On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive yield by any other means Recommender systems have many fasci- health communication. Communication Monographs. 72, 144-168. doi: 10.1080/ ating features, among them providing learners with access to Drachsler, H. Hummel, H G K. Koper R (2009). Identifying the goal, user model information that no other method can accomplish. In light of these ns of recommender systems for formal and informal learning potentials it is more than likely that recommenders for learning are here to stay. However, their exploration by social scientists has just Drachsler H Hummel.H GK, an den Berg. B.Eshuis. J.Waterink, W.Nadolski, begun in self-organised learning networks. Jourmal of educational Technology 8 Sociery. Drachsler, H, Rutledge, L, van Rosmalen, P, Hummel, H, Pecceu, D, Arts, T, et al. References (2010)ReMashed-An usability study of a recommender system for mash-ups learning. International Journal of emerging Technologies in Learning, 5.7- ems. &. survey o t he ssateowahe t naed CSCL: A psychological perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 949-960. Adomavicius, G,& Tuzhilin, A(2011). re recommender systems. In E. Entwistle N. (1988 Motivational factors in students' approaches to learning In R. 23 N technical approach towards supporting intra-organ se third o International Joi rence on Artificial Intelligence(pp. 49-56). Farzan, R.& Brusilovsky, P.(2006). Social na In a course Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 5192, pp 33-3 in, Germany: Springer ter science. 4018 91-10 doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87605-24. Felfernig, A, Friedrich, G, Gula M, Kruggel, T, Leitner, G et al.(2007). Anderson, ].R, boyle, C. F,& Reiser, B J(1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Persuasive recommendation: Serial position effects in knowledge-ba ne,228.456-462.doi:10.1126/ scien doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77006-034 003). Integrating a multi-agent recommendation system into a mobile Fernandez-Luque R,& vognild, L K.(2009). Challenges and learning management system. Proceedings of artificial Intelligence int Mobile Bandura, A (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. formatics in a united and healthy Europe(pp. 903-907) Stockholm, Sweden: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall OS Press goal theory perspective. Learning and Instruction, 8, 13-22 r own learning: A Festinger, L(1954) A theory of social companson processes. Human Relations, 7. Boekaerts, M (1998) Boosting students'capacity to promote 117-140.doi:10.1177/001872675400700202. umal of Consumer Research, 20, 303-3 arning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 533-544. doi: 10.1016 Fogg. B J. (2003) Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and Brin, S.& Page. L(1993). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search Geyer-Schulz A, Hahsler. M-& Jahn, M.(2001). Educational and scientific 552(9800110X iversity. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17, 153-163 Brinol, P.& Petty, P. E(2009). Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation Geyer-SchuIz, A, Hahsler, M, Neumann, A,& Thede, A(2003) An integration oach. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 49-96. doi: 10.108 463280802643640. Schader, W. Gaul, M. vichi(Eds ) Between data science and applied data L, Ash, D, Rutherford, M, Nakagawa, K, Gordon, A, analysis(pp 412-420) Berlin, Germany: Springer he classroom. In G. Salomon(Ed ) Distribut ignitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188-228). New Bruner, ]S(1961 act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32. Harper, F. M, Li, S.X Chen, Y, Konstan,J. A(2007). So Midd 148-159) Berlin. Germany: Springer.doi:10.1007/9783-540-77006020 Herlocker, J. L, Konstan, I A, Borchers, A&RiedL, J.(1999). An algorithmic orative Learning (vol. 2, pp. 796-800) Hong Kong, China: Internationa rmation Retrieval (pp. 203-237). Berkeley, CA: ACM Press. doi: 10. 1145/ 312624312682 and User-Adapted Interaction, 12. 331-370. doi: 10.1023 Herlocker, J L, Konstan, J. A, Riedl, J(2000), Explaining collaborative filterin A:1021240730564.in educational contexts. Though some applications are around, many of them do not move beyond a prototype development. Implementation studies would typically be case studies or experi￾ments with a ‘‘tool vs. no tool’’ condition. Second, we need more applied experimental research that varies boundary conditions, but keeps technology constant. For instance, it would be interest￾ing to see how one and the same recommender system works with different tasks, or different learners with different learning styles and different proficiency levels. This would help illuminating the potentials and the limitations of educational recommender sys￾tems. And third, we need more research on the basic psychological mechanisms that are addressed when learners use a recommender system. For instance, our own empirical work on the effectiveness of preference-inconsistent recommendations, while not employing a full-blown recommender system, can be regarded as a step to￾wards uncovering the psychological dynamics that specific types of recommendations create. Technologies need to have an added value in order to become incorporated in everyday learning settings. Technologies must make us capable of accomplishing things that are impossible to yield by any other means. Recommender systems have many fasci￾nating features, among them providing learners with access to information that no other method can accomplish. In light of these potentials it is more than likely that recommenders for learning are here to stay. However, their exploration by social scientists has just begun. References Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17, 734–749. doi:10.1109/ TKDE.2005.99. Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2011). Context-aware recommender systems. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, & P. B. Kantor (Eds.), Recommender systems handbook: A complete guide for research scientists and practitioners (pp. 217–253). New York, NY: Springer. Aehnelt, M., Ebert, M., Beham, G., Lindstaedt, S., & Paschen, A. (2008). A socio￾technical approach towards supporting intra-organizational collaboration. In P. Dillenbourg & M. Specht (Eds.). Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 5192, pp. 33–38). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87605-2_4. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., & Reiser, B. J. (1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Science, 228, 456–462. doi:10.1126/science.228.4698.456. Andronico, A., Carbonaro, A., Casadei, G., Colazzo, L., Molinari, A., & Ronchetti, M. (2003). Integrating a multi-agent recommendation system into a mobile learning management system. Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Mobile System, 123–132. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Boekaerts, M. (1998). Boosting students’ capacity to promote their own learning: A goal theory perspective. Learning and Instruction, 8, 13–22. doi:10.1016/S0959- 4752(98)00008-5. Boekaerts, M., & Minnaert, A. (1999). Self-regulation with respect to informal learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 533–544. doi:10.1016/ S0883-0355(99)00020-8. Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30, 107–117. doi:10.1016/S0169- 7552(98)00110-X. Briñol, P., & Petty, P. E. (2009). Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 49–96. doi:10.1080/ 10463280802643640. Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188–228). New York, NJ: Cambridge University Press. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 87–110. doi:10.1023/A:1011143116306. Buder, J., & Schwind, C. (2011). Recommender systems: A technology to foster individual and collaborative learning. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.). Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (Vol. 2, pp. 796–800). Hong Kong, China: International Society of the Learning Sciences. Burke, R. (2002). Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12, 331–370. doi:10.1023/ A:1021240730564. Buunk, B. P., Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., van Yperen, N. W., & Dakof, G. A. (1990). The affective consequences of social comparison: Either direction has its ups and downs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1238–1249. doi:10.1037/ 0022-3514.59.6.1238. Cai, X., Bain, M., Krzywicki, A., Wobcke, W., Kim, Y. S., Compton, P., et al. (2011). Collaborative filtering for people to people recommendation in social networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6464, 476–485. doi:10.1007/978-3-642- 17432-2_48. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35. doi:10.3102/ 00346543064001001. Cosley, D., Lam, S. K., Albert, I., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2003). Is seeing believing? How recommender system interfaces affect users’ opinions. In G. Cockton & P. Korhonen (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 585–592). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/ 642611.642713. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York, NY: Irvington. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125. De Wit, F.R.C., Greer, L.L., 2008. The black-box deciphered: A meta-analysis of team diversity, conflict, and team performance. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings. Dillard, J., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144–168. doi:10.1080/ 03637750500111815. Drachsler, H., Hummel, H. G. K., & Koper, R. (2009). Identifying the goal, user model and conditions of recommender systems for formal and informal learning. Journal of Digital Information, 10. Drachsler, H., Hummel, H. G. K., van den Berg, B., Eshuis, J., Waterink, W., Nadolski, R., et al. (2009). Effects of the ISIS recommender system for navigation support in self-organised learning networks. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12, 122–135. Drachsler, H., Rutledge, L., van Rosmalen, P., Hummel, H., Pecceu, D., Arts, T., et al. (2010). ReMashed – An usability study of a recommender system for mash-ups for learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 5, 7–11. doi:10.3991/ijet.v5s1.1191. Engelmann, T., Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., & Buder, J. (2009). Knowledge awareness in CSCL: A psychological perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 949–960. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.004. Entwistle, N. (1988). Motivational factors in students’ approaches to learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 21–51). New York, NY: Plenum. Farzan, R., Brusilovsky, P., 2005. Social navigation support in e-learning: What are the real footprints? In: B. Mobasher & S.S. Anand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 49-56). Farzan, R., & Brusilovsky, P. (2006). Social navigation support in a course recommendation system. Computer Science, 4018, 91–100. Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., Gula, B., Hitz, M., Kruggel, T., Leitner, G., et al. (2007). Persuasive recommendation: Serial position effects in knowledge-based recommender systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4744, 283–294. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_34. Fernandez-Luque, L., Karlsen, R., & Vognild, L. K. (2009). Challenges and opportunities of using recommender systems for personalized health education. In K. P. Adlassnig, B. Blobel, J. Mantas, & I. Masic (Eds.), Medical informatics in a united and healthy Europe (pp. 903–907). Stockholm, Sweden: IOS Press. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202. Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 303–315. Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers. Geyer-Schulz, A., Hahsler, M., & Jahn, M. (2001). Educational and scientific recommender systems: Designing the information channels of the virtual university. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17, 153–163. Geyer-Schulz, A., Hahsler, M., Neumann, A., & Thede, A. (2003). An integration strategy for distributed recommender services in legacy library systems. In M. Schader, W. Gaul, & M. Vichi (Eds.), Between data science and applied data analysis (pp. 412–420). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Glance, N. S., Arregui, D., & Dardenne, M. (1999). Making recommender systems work for organizations. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-agent Technology, 57–76. Harper, F. M., Li, S. X., Chen, Y., & Konstan, J. A. (2007). Social comparisons to motivate contributions to an online community. In Y. de Kort, W. Ijsselsteijn, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & B. J. Fogg (Eds.). Persuasive Technology (Vol. 4744, pp. 148–159). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_20. Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Borchers, A., & Riedl, J. (1999). An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In F. Gey, M. Hearst, & R. Tong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd ACM IR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 203–237). Berkeley, CA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/ 312624.312682. Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2000). Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In W. Kellog & S. Whittaker (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM J. Buder, C. Schwind / Computers in Human Behavior 28 (2012) 207–216 215