2.小组讨论 (1)Rapid critical appraisal ofa systematic review How well was the research done?-F.A.I.T.H.method Question Does the systematic review address a focused question(PICO)? What is best? Where do I find the information? The main question being addressed should be The Title, paragraph clearly stated.The expsresuchasa therapy of the Introduction should clearly state diagnostic test,and the outcome(s)of interest the question. will often be expressed in terms of a simple relationship This paper:Yes No Unclear Comment .and use it to direct the search and select articles for inclusion? What is best? Where do Ifind the information? The inclusion or exclusion of studies in a The Methods section should describe in systematic review should be clearly defined a detail the inclusion and exclusion oriori The eligibility criteria used should specify criteria Normally.this will include the he patients. ter entions or expo ures and study design. mes of in terest.In many cases the type of study design will also be a key component of the eligibility criteria. This paper:.Yes▣No▣Unclear▣ Comment FDid the search find all the relevant evidence? What is best? Where do I find the information? The starting point for comprehensive search for section should describ all relevant studies is the major bibliographic the search strategy,including the terms databases (e.g.,Medline,Cochrane,EMBASE used,in some detail.The Resulrs etc)but should also include a search of reference section will outline the number of titles lists from relevant studies,use of Science and abstracts reviewed,the number of Citation Index, and contact with experts full-text studies retrievec and the particularly to inquire about unpublished studies number of studies excluded together The search should not be limited to English with the reasons for exclusion.This language only.The search strategy should information may be presented in a include both MESH terms and text words figure of flow chart. This paper:Yes▣ No▣Unclear Comment: 2. 小组讨论 (1) Rapid critical appraisal of a systematic review How well was the research done? ----F.A.I.T.H. method Question Does the systematic review address a focused question (PICO) ? What is best? Where do I find the information? The main question being addressed should be clearly stated. The exposure, such as a therapy or diagnostic test, and the outcome(s) of interest will often be expressed in terms of a simple relationship. The Title, Abstract or final paragraph of the Introduction should clearly state the question. This paper: Yes □ No □ Unclear □ Comment: … and use it to direct the search and select articles for inclusion? What is best? Where do I find the information? The inclusion or exclusion of studies in a systematic review should be clearly defined a priori. The eligibility criteria used should specify the patients, interventions or exposures and outcomes of interest. In many cases the type of study design will also be a key component of the eligibility criteria. The Methods section should describe in detail the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Normally, this will include the study design. This paper: Yes □ No □ Unclear □ Comment: F Did the search find all the relevant evidence? What is best? Where do I find the information? The starting point for comprehensive search for all relevant studies is the major bibliographic databases (e.g., Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, etc) but should also include a search of reference lists from relevant studies, use of Science Citation Index, and contact with experts, particularly to inquire about unpublished studies. The search should not be limited to English language only. The search strategy should include both MESH terms and text words. The Methods section should describe the search strategy, including the terms used, in some detail. The Results section will outline the number of titles and abstracts reviewed, the number of full-text studies retrieved, and the number of studies excluded together with the reasons for exclusion. This information may be presented in a figure of flow chart. This paper: Yes □ No □ Unclear □ Comment: