Why Do We Need the Liberal Arts?Because It Gives Us Sci-fi JUDITH SHULEVITZ The liberal arts are very old and very distinguished,and those who teach them are among the bitterest people I know.University presidents,trustees,and state legislatures are slashing their funding or getting rid of their subjects altogether. (French,German,Italian,and the classics will likely be the first to go.)Governor Rick Scott of Florida thinks that state universities should charge higher tuition to students who choose majors in fields that don't lead directly to jobs.Even the social sciences are endangered:Republicans in Congress have been trying to pass an amendment to an appropriations bill that would forbid the National Science Foundation from funding any research in the human sciences not considered essential for America's security or economic interests.Meanwhile,in their pristine new laboratories,the natural sciences thrive."Spending for the humanities research in 2011 amounted to less than half of one percent of the amount dedicated to science and engineering research and development in the United States,"English professor Homi Bhabha said at a gloomy conference on the future of the humanities at Harvard in April,2013. umes Illustration by Joe Wilson How does one make the "clear and compelling case for the liberal arts?"asked an alarmed report submitted to Congress a couple weeks ago.It's not hard.The most popular case,at the moment,is the preservationist one:The job of the humanities is "understanding,curating,and transmitting the first four thousand five hundred years of human consciousness,"as Columbia Sanskrit professor Sheldon Pollock put it at the Harvard gathering.Cultivating political character is another defense.The liberalWhy Do We Need the Liberal Arts? Because It Gives Us Sci-fi JUDITH SHULEVITZ The liberal arts are very old and very distinguished, and those who teach them are among the bitterest people I know. University presidents, trustees, and state legislatures are slashing their funding or getting rid of their subjects altogether. (French, German, Italian, and the classics will likely be the first to go.) Governor Rick Scott of Florida thinks that state universities should charge higher tuition to students who choose majors in fields that don’t lead directly to jobs. Even the social sciences are endangered: Republicans in Congress have been trying to pass an amendment to an appropriations bill that would forbid the National Science Foundation from funding any research in the human sciences not considered essential for America’s security or economic interests. Meanwhile, in their pristine new laboratories, the natural sciences thrive. “Spending for the humanities research in 2011 amounted to less than half of one percent of the amount dedicated to science and engineering research and development in the United States,” English professor Homi Bhabha said at a gloomy conference on the future of the humanities at Harvard in April, 2013. Illustration by Joe Wilson How does one make the “clear and compelling case for the liberal arts?” asked an alarmed report submitted to Congress a couple weeks ago. It’s not hard. The most popular case, at the moment, is the preservationist one: The job of the humanities is “understanding, curating, and transmitting the first four thousand five hundred years of human consciousness,” as Columbia Sanskrit professor Sheldon Pollock put it at the Harvard gathering. Cultivating political character is another defense. The liberal