APPLICATIONOF ADMINISTRATIVELAW TOPRIVATZATIONS That does not mean that there is no reason for specific control by the public authority on such companies. Here has to be mentioned that the Cham ber of Account is theauthority to control any company in which the govemment holds substantal amount of shares. When the quality of the representation of the public tasks of the company is concerned the finance lly orientated control of the Chamber of Account may however be insufficient. Special regulation on the obligation to give information may be approprate in cases in which the information the government can get from the regular documents he is ent ited to as a shareholder or a special supervisor do not give enough specific infomation he may need in view on the aspects of common interest he has to represent Sometimes special bodies for control are fomed or the administrative courts are declared competent 5.4 Public law applicableon output of private corporations Until so far we have discussed what the role of public law is concerned the influence thereof on the organisational structure and the division of powers within the organisation. In this par. we will discuss the role administrative law and especally the rule of the norms of the General Administrative Law Act(Awb )plays when legal acts of private companies are judged by the courts In this respect we have to discern between two situations In some cases a private organisation with a public task can be qualified as an adminstrative organ exart 1 I sub b Awb. Whena private organisation is vested with public authoritity to represent his public task he has to be rega rded as an adm inistrative organ when I and only then he exercises his public authority. In that case the rules of the Awb are fully applica ble and the adminstrative courts are ompetent. Almost all examples of such private organisations are foundations. We will therefore leave them aside. We would only like to mention here that according to art3. 1 par. 2 Awb the rules of the Awb concerning besluiten are also applicable private legalacts of an adm inistrative authority if this does not contradict with nature of these acts 2. In other cases a private organisation with public tasks will represent them without exercising public authority but using instruments based on private aw Contracts are often used and as we mentioned before these contracts are principally regarded as private contracts. Nevertheless the influence of public law on these contractual relations is indenable, In case law the applicability of the so called principles of fair administration meanwhile partly codified in the Awb I is accepted over the lst 15 year or so in cases where a public authority uses private law so also In contract aw. Less clear however is whether this is the case when a private organisation representing a public task, uses instruments based on private law.The relevance of public law for private legal acts in general is shown in art. 3. 14 BWin which in is stated that the exercisition of power based on private law must not contradict with codified or non-codified rules of public law. So based on that point of view one can presume that in cases wherein this exercisition of private law based powers are aimed at the representation of the public interst, the application of these rinciples of fair adm inistration is feasible. An interesting question in this respect however is whether or not these principles of fair administration, being developed asAPPLICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TO PRIVATIZATIONS 11 That does not mean that there is no reason for specific control by the public authority on such companies. Here has to be mentioned that the Chamber of Account has the authority to control any company in which the government holds a substantial amount of shares . When the quality of the representation of the public tasks of the company is concerned the financially orientated control of the Chamber of Account may however be insufficient. Special regulation on the obligation to give information may be appropriate in cases in which the information the government can get from the regular documents he is entitled to as a shareholder or a special supervisor do not give enough specific information he may need in view on the aspects of common interest he has to represent. Sometimes special bodies for control are formed or the administrative courts are declared competent. 5.4 Public law applicable on output of private corporations Until so far we have discussed what the role of public law is concerned, the influence thereof on the organisational structure and the division of powers within the organisation. In this par. we will discuss the role administrative law and especially the rule of the norms of the General Administrative Law Act (Awb) plays when legal acts of private companies are judged by the courts. In this respect we have to discern between two situations: 1. In some cases a private organisation with a public task can be qualified as an adminstrative organ ex art.1.1 sub b Awb. When a private organisation is vested with public authoritity to represent his public task he has to be rega rded as an administrative organ when  and only then  he exercises his public authority. In that case the rules of the Awb are fully applicable and the adminstrative courts are competent. Almost all examples of such private organisations are foundations. We will therefore leave them aside. We would only like to mention here that according to art 3.1 par.2 Awb the rules of the Awb concerning besluiten are also applicable on private legal acts of an administrative authority if this does not contradict with nature of these acts. 2. In other cases a private organisation with public tasks will represent them without exercising public authority but using instruments based on private law. Contracts are often used and as we mentioned before these contracts are principally regarded as private contracts. Nevertheless the influence of public law on these contractual relations is indeniable. In case law the applicability of the so called principles of fair administration meanwhile partly codified in the Awb  is accepted over the last 15 year or so in cases where a public authority uses private law so also in contract law. Less clear however is whether this is the case when a private organisation representing a public ta sk, uses instruments based on private law.The relevance of public law for private legal acts in general is shown in art. 3.14 BW in which in is stated that the exercisition of power based on private law must not contradict with codified or non-codified rules of public law. So based on that point of view one can presume that in cases wherein this exercisition of private law based powers are aimed at the representation of the public interst, the application of these principles of fair administration is feasible. An interesting question in this respect however is whether or not these principles of fair administration, being developed as