18参考 Jacques Derrida, Spurs/Operons( Chicago: University of Chicago Press1978以及后现代主义较为同情性的批评,如 Naomi Schor "Dreaming Dissymmetry: Barthes, Foucault and Sexual Difference"in men in Feminism edited by Alice Jardine and Paul Smit/(New York: Methuen, 1987); Alice Jardine, Gynesis: Configurations of woman and Modernity (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985),特别是第九章; Susan bordo," Feminism, Postmodernism and Gender- Skepticism," in Linda j. Nicholson,ed, Feminism and the Subversion of ldentity(New York: Routledge, 1990) 19这些论点可见于 Sandra Harding" Feminism, Science, and the Anti-Enlightenment Critpiques”与 Christine Di Stefano," Dilemmas of difference: Feminism, Modernity, and postmodernism,”两者接收录于 Linda j. Nicholson,ed, Feminism/ Postmodernism:以及Mary E Hawkesworth, "Knowers, Knowing, Known: Feminist Theory and the Claims of Truth, "in Feminism Theory in Practice and Process, edited by Micheline R. Malson, Jean F O'Barr, Sarah Westphall-wihl, Mary Wyer(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989) 20这种立场较强力的论述可见 Nancy Hartsock,“ Foucault on power: A Theory for Women?," in Linda j. Nicholson, d, Feminism/Postmodernism;以及 Mary E. Hawkesworth,“ Knowers, Knowing. Known"很多女性主义对后现代主义的辩论转向政 治问题:就是女性主义行动的合法性及效率是否需要一个知识论的解释/基础。有关这个辩论,详见 Nancy Fraser and Linda J Nicholson, "Social Criticism without Philosophy: An Encounter between Feminism and Postmodernism, Seyla Benhabib, “ Epistemologies of Postmodernism: A Rejoinder to Jean- Francois Lyotard,”两者接收录于 Linda J. Nicholson, Reminism/Postmodernism; Linda Alcoff, "Cultural Feminism versus Post-Structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory," in Micheline R. Maison,etal, Feminist Theon:以及 Feminist Studies.14,1( Spring1988)中的论文,和 Donna Haraway Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective, " Feminist Studies, 14, 3(Fall 1988), pp. 575-99, Nancy Fraser, Unruly Practices: Kathy E. Ferguson, " Interpretation and Genealogy in Feminism, "Sign, 16, 2(Winter 1991) [21]Barbara Christian, The Race for Theory, " Feminist STudies, 14, I( Summer 1988), Pp 67-79, Audre Lorde, Sister Outsider( Trumansburg, N. Y Crossing Press, 1984); Deborah K. King, "Multiple Jeopardy, Multiple Consciousnes Black Feminist Ideology, "in Micheline R. Malson et al., Feminist Theory; Elizabeth V. Spelman, Inessential Woman: ProblemsorQ ess: The Context for Exclusion in Feminist Thought(Boston: Beacon, 1988), Biddy Martin and Chandra Talpade Mohanty, "Feminist Politics: What's Home Got to Do With It?, in Feminist Studies/Critical Studies, edited by Terasa de lauretis(Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986; and mice Johnson Reagon, "Coalition Politics: Turning the Century, "in Home Girls: A Black Feminist Anthology, edited by Barbara Smith (New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press, 1983). 122如我在 Thinking Fragments( Berkeley: University of California Press1990)中所论,后现代主义不是超越批评或完美无暇的。我 乇意宣称关于种族和其它差异的焦虑是排斥它的唯一原因。我尝试要做的是搞淸楚某些女性主义者对这些著作有情绪化的强烈 反感的部份原因,特别有时她们对这些著作根本了解不多。这样剧烈的反应令人困惑,尤其是这些人平常对理念的响应都复杂 化与贴切得多。有关后现代主义、种族与性别,见 Bell hooks, earning( Boston: South end press,1990). 231 Stuar Hampshire, Innocence and Experience: Agnes Heller and Ferenc Feher, The Postmodernism Political Condition(New York Columbia University press, 1989),and Judith N Shklar, "Injustice, Injury and Inequality: An Introduction, "in Justice and Equality in the Here and Now, edited by Frank s Lucash(Ithaca: Comell University Press, 1986) [24] Richard Rorty, "Method, SocialScience, and Social Hope, "in Consequences of Pragmatism, p. 208[18] 参考 Jacques Derrida, Spurs/Eperons (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978) 以及后现代主义较为同情性的批评，如 Naomi Schor “Dreaming Dissymmetry: Barthes, Foucault and Sexual Difference” in men in Feminism edited by Alice Jardine and Paul Smith(New York: Methuen,1987); Alice Jardine, Gynesis: Configurations of Woman and Modernity (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985), 特别是第九章；Susan Bordo, “Feminism, Postmodernism and Gender-Skepticism,” in Linda J. Nicholson, ed., Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1990). [19] 这些论点可见于 Sandra Harding, “Feminism, Science, and the Anti-Enlightenment Critpiques,” 与 Christine Di Stefano, “Dilemmas of Difference: Feminism, Modernity, and Postmodernism,” 两者接收录于 Linda J. Nicholson, ed., Feminism/Postmodernism; 以及 Mary E. Hawkesworth, “Knowers, Knowing, Known: Feminist Theory and the Claims of Truth,” in Feminism Theory in Practice and Process,edited by Micheline R. Malson, Jean F. O’Barr, Sarah Westphall-Wihl, Mary Wyer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989). [20] 这种立场较强力的论述可见 Nancy Hartsock, “Foucault on Power: A Theory for Women?,” in Linda j. Nicholson, ed., Feminism/Postmodernism; 以及 Mary E. Hawkesworth, “Knowers, Knowing, Known.” 很多女性主义对后现代主义的辩论转向政 治问题：就是女性主义行动的合法性及效率是否需要一个知识论的解释／ 基础。有关这个辩论，详见 Nancy Fraser and Linda J. Nicholson, “Social Criticism without Philosophy: An Encounter between Feminism and Postmodernism,” 与 Seyla Benhabib, “Epistemologies of Postmodernism: A Rejoinder to Jean-François Lyotard,” 两者接收录于 Linda J. Nicholson, Reminism/Postmodernism; Linda Alcoff, “Cultural Feminism versus Post-Structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory,” in Micheline R. Malson, et al., Feminist Theory; 以及 Feminist Studies, 14, 1 (Spring 1988) 中的论文，和 Donna Haraway, “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective,” Feminist Studies, 14, 3 (Fall 1988), pp. 575-99; Nancy Fraser, Unruly Practices; Kathy E. Ferguson, “Interpretation and Genealogy in Feminism,” Sign, 16, 2 (Winter 1991), pp. 322-39. [21] Barbara Christian, “The Race for Theory,” Feminist Studies, 14, 1 (Summer 1988), pp. 67-79; Audre Lorde, Sister Outsider(Trumansburg, N. Y.: Crossing Press, 1984); Deborah K. King, “Multiple Jeopardy, Multiple Consciousness: The Context for a Black Feminist Ideology,” in Micheline R. Malson et al., Feminist Theory; Elizabeth V. Spelman, Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought (Boston: Beacon, 1988); Biddy Martin and Chandra Talpade Mohanty, “Feminist Politics: What’s Home Got to Do With It?,” in Feminist Studies/Critical Studies, edited by Terasa de Lauretis (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986); and Bernice Johnson Reagon, “Coalition Politics: Turning the Century,” in Home Girls: A Black Feminist Anthology, edited by Barbara Smith (New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press, 1983). [22] 如我在Thinking Fragments (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990) 中所论，后现代主义不是超越批评或完美无暇的。我 无意宣称关于种族和其它差异的焦虑是排斥它的唯一原因。我尝试要做的是搞清楚某些女性主义者对这些著作有情绪化的强烈 反感的部份原因，特别有时她们对这些著作根本了解不多。这样剧烈的反应令人困惑，尤其是这些人平常对理念的响应都复杂 化与贴切得多。有关后现代主义、种族与性别，见 Bell Hooks, Yearning (Boston: South End Press, 1990). [23] 见 Stuar Hampshire, Innocence and Experience; Agnes Heller and Ferenc Feher, The Postmodernism Political Condition (New York: Columbia University press, 1989); and Judith N. Shklar, “Injustice, Injury and Inequality: An Introduction,” in Justice and Equality in the Here and Now, edited by Frank s. Lucash (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986). [24] Richard Rorty, “Method, SocialScience, and Social Hope,” in Consequences of Pragmatism, p. 208