Due Sept 17. 2002 1. a) Mean free path 2= kBI d-p where k=1.38×102,T=293K,p=10mTor=133Pa,d=1A=100m 38×10-3(293 6.9cm ford=1A Jr(m)(332)017mfrd=2A b) Use the ideal gas law pV=nkB T 1.33Pa vk7(138×102X90)33×10m-33×10cm3

United Nations Convention on the law of the sea CONTENTS PREAMBLE e22 PARTL INTRODUCTION Article I Use of terms and scope

The Harmonisation of Private Law in Europe: Some Insights from Evolutionary Theory Jan M. Smits* 1.Introduction Alan Watson has provided us with abundant and beautiful evidence that\most changes in most systems are the result of borrowing\. But as a legal historian and comparative lawyer, Watson has

School of Law, University of Glasgow Readers are reminded that this work is protected by copyright. While they are free to use the ideas expressed in it, they may not copy, distribute or publish the work or part of it, in any form, printed, electronic or otherwise, except for reasonable quoting, clearly indicating the source. Readers are permitted to make copies, electronically or printed, for personal and classroom use

Hydrogels in drug delivery Control of drug release kinetics by hydrogel structure6, Release from stable hydrogels is controlled by diffusion of solute through the network Diffusion is described by Fick,s second law

The gravitational force 2. Newtons law of universal gravitation

CONTENT Wa and demand law From preferences to utility Utility maximization EXpenditure minimization

1.Integrability Demand function x(p,w)(.d.) is HDO, satisfied Walras Law and have a substitution matrix S(p,w) is s.n.s.d. for any (p,w), if it's deduced by rational preference. And if we observed an x(p,w) satisfied such conditions, can we find a preference to rationalization(p,w)? That the integrability problem

Preference and Choice Content: Preference and rationality The rule of choice Budget Demand function WAand demanded law

CONTENT WA and demand law From preferences to utility Utility maximization Expenditure minimization