第11期 深度情境化与诠释:管理学的质性研究方法 9 Friedlmeier W, Chakkarath P, Schwarz B. Culture and Hu- A Guide to Qualitative Observation and man Development: The Importance of Cross-Culture Res- ysis[M]. Massachusetts: Wadsworth Publishing Company, earch for the Social Sciences[M]. New York: Psychology 2006 Press. 2005 [23] Munch A. Everyone gets to participate: Floating [10 Triandis H C. Individualism and Collectivism[M]. Bou- unity in an amateur softball league[ M] //Morrill C, Ider: Westview Press. 1995 A, White C. Together [!l黄光国.建构中国管理学理论的机会与挑战[M∥陈晓萍 in Public Places. Berkeley: University of California Press, 徐淑英,樊景立。组织与管理研究的实证方法.北京:北京 大学出版社,2008 [24 Roth J. Comments on secret observation[M]/Filstead [2】]德鲁克PF.管理一任务、责任、实践M]孙耀君,译 wJ. Qualitative Methodology: Firsthand Involvement 北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005 with the Social World. Chicago: Markham, 1970 ]]戴尔E.伟大的组织者M]孙耀君,译.北京:中国社会[25]雷恩DA.管理思想史[M]孙健敏,黃小勇,李原,译 科学出版社,1991 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009 [4吕力.论管理学艺术化商业经济,2010(12):53-5626]笛卡尔R.谈谈方法M王太庆,译.北京:商务印书馆, 15费孝通.试谈扩展社会学的传统边界北京大学学报 2001 (哲学社会科学版),2003,40(3):5-16 [27] Schutz A. Collected Papers of Alfred Schutz[M]. Neth [16]麦克道威尔J.心灵与世界[M]刘叶涛,译.北京:中国 erlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962 人民大学出版社,2006 [28] Taylor C. Human Agency and Language [M]. Cambridge [7]戴维森D.真理、意义与方法[M]牟博,译.北京:商务 Cambridge University Press, 1985 印书馆,2007 [29]泰德洛克B.民族志和民族志描述DM∥邓津NK,林肯 [18] Davis F. The Martian and the convert: Ontological po- VS.定性研究:策略与艺术.风笑天,译.重庆:重庆大学 larities in social research]. Urban Life, 1973(2): 333-343 版社,2007 [】9]吕力管理学研究中 证伪、还原与诠释管理学报,[30] Elwin v. The Tribal World of Verrier ElwinM]Bomb 20096(10):1285-1290 Oxford University Press, 1964 [20) Chagnon N A. Yanomamo: The Fierce People[M]. New [31 Revans R w. Action Learning: New Techniques for Ma York: CBS College Publishing, 1983 nagement [M. London: Blond& Briggs, 1980 [21]明茨伯格H.管理工作的本质M]方海萍,译北京:中国[32]刘文瑞.守安身立命之地,走继往开来之路:简评《管理 人民大学出版社,2007 学报》近期的争鸣文章管理学报,20118(8):140-114 [22] Lofland J, Snow D A, Lofland L H. Analyzing Social (责任编辑徐惠) Deep Contextualization and Hermeneutic: Qualitative Research in Management LV L (School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China) Abstract: According to the PIKE's theory of emic/etic, context-embedded research is an etic research Regard less of their 'depth. Management culture and art contain people's thoughts, ideas, will and emotions with individ- ual, non-deterministic and non-quantitative nature. The natural sciences cannot objectively describe them. They can only be grasp through the deeply involvement and interpretation. Deep contextualization should never be simply in- become an emic researcher. Emic research is a common requirement for all qualitative study which means we must study in the view of research subjects Key words: emic research; context-sensitive research; deeply involvement; understand; hermeneutic 21994-2014ChinaAcademicJOurnalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreservedhttp://www.cnki.net第11期 深度情境化与诠释：管理学的质性研究方法 ·37· [9] Friedlmeier W, Chakkarath P, Schwarz B. Culture and Hu￾man Development: The Importance of Cross-Culture Res￾earch for the Social Sciences[M]. New York: Psychology Press, 2005 [10] Triandis H C. Individualism and Collectivism[M]. Bou￾lder: Westview Press, 1995 [11] 黄光国. 建构中国管理学理论的机会与挑战[M] // 陈晓萍, 徐淑英，樊景立. 组织与管理研究的实证方法. 北京：北京 大学出版社,2008 [12] 德鲁克 P F. 管理—任务、责任、实践[M]. 孙耀君，译. 北京：中国社会科学出版社，2005 [13] 戴尔 E. 伟大的组织者[M]. 孙耀君，译. 北京：中国社会 科学出版社，1991 [14] 吕力. 论管理学艺术化[J]. 商业经济，2010（12）：53-56 [15] 费孝通. 试谈扩展社会学的传统边界[J]. 北京大学学报 （哲学社会科学版），2003,40（3）：5-16 [16] 麦克道威尔 J. 心灵与世界[M]. 刘叶涛，译. 北京：中国 人民大学出版社，2006 [17] 戴维森 D. 真理、意义与方法[M]. 牟博，译. 北京：商务 印书馆，2007 [18] Davis F. The Martian and the convert: Ontological po￾larities in social research[J]. Urban Life, 1973(2):333-343 [19] 吕力. 管理学研究中的证实、证伪、还原与诠释[J]. 管理学报， 2009,6（10）：1285-1290 [20] Chagnon N A. Yanomamo: The Fierce People[M]. New York: CBS College Publishing, 1983 [21] 明茨伯格 H. 管理工作的本质[M]. 方海萍，译. 北京：中国 人民大学出版社，2007 [22] Lofland J, Snow D A, Lofland L H. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Anal￾ysis[M]. Massachusetts: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 2006 [23] Munch A. Everyone gets to participate: Floating comm￾unity in an amateur softball league[M] // Morrill C, Snow D A, White C. Together Alone: Personal Relationships in Public Places. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005 [24] Roth J. Comments on secret observation[M] // Filstead W J. Qualitative Methodology: Firsthand Involvement with the Social World. Chicago: Markham, 1970 [25] 雷恩 D A. 管理思想史[M]. 孙健敏，黄小勇，李原，译. 北京：中国人民大学出版社，2009 [26] 笛卡尔 R. 谈谈方法[M]. 王太庆，译. 北京：商务印书馆, 2001 [27] Schutz A. Collected Papers of Alfred Schutz[M]. Neth￾erlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962 [28] Taylor C. Human Agency and Language[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985 [29] 泰德洛克 B. 民族志和民族志描述[M] // 邓津 N K., 林肯 VS. 定性研究：策略与艺术. 风笑天，译. 重庆：重庆大学 出版社，2007 [30] Elwin V. The Tribal World of Verrier Elwin[M]. Bomb￾ay: Oxford University Press, 1964 [31] Revans R W. Action Learning: New Techniques for Ma￾nagement[M]. London: Blond& Briggs,1980 [32] 刘文瑞. 守安身立命之地，走继往开来之路：简评《管理 学报》近期的争鸣文章[J]. 管理学报，2011,8（8）：1140-1145 （责任编辑 徐 惠） Deep Contextualization and Hermeneutic: Qualitative Research in Management LV Li (School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China) Abstract: According to the PIKE's theory of‘emic/etic’, context-embedded research is an etic research Regard￾less of their‘depth’. Management culture and art contain people's thoughts, ideas, will and emotions with individ￾ual, non-deterministic and non-quantitative nature. The natural sciences cannot objectively describe them. They can only be grasp through the deeply involvement and interpretation. Deep contextualization should never be simply in￾terpreted as a‘rich context variables’, it means that researcher must move beyond the barriers of positivism and become an emic researcher. Emic research is a common requirement for all qualitative study which means we must study in the view of research subjects. Key words: emic research; context-sensitive research; deeply involvement; understand; hermeneutic