erforderliche Ausgewogenheit In 28-G" is part of a support-verb-construction with the verb SEIN ',, the whole TE is der Ansicht SEIN'(Lit.: can be considered), while in 29-G'Ansicht'is part of the phrase 'PRONOUN Ansicht nach(Lit. : "in someone's view)which represents an adjunct, functioning as a hed ging device that can be added to almost any sentence 4 3. Do the syntactic valency sentence patterns of CoNSIDER relate to TEs? In the following analysis an investigation into the correspondence of the valency sentence patterns of CONSIDER and its most frequent German TEs is undertaken. The key questions to be explored are whether the valency sentence patterns of CONSIDER have preferred TEs, and if so, whether these TEs occur with a valency sentence pattem similar to that of conSIder Table 8 shows an extract of the valency sentence patterns of CONSIDER and the most frequent TEs of CONSIDER. The multi-word TEs are still shown as single words, but a distinction is made as to whether these function as support-verb-constructions or as adjuncts. The occurrence of a TE for a valency sentence pattern of CONSIDER is given in percentages, based on 50 randomly chosen concordance lines from the EuroParl corpus for each German TE Table 8. Valency patterns of CONSIDER and translation equivalents CONSIDER 6% 【6%7 s则 ivb-to-b 6%2% mm鲤 d vb-to-Ant 100%100%10% 40%10%100%100%10%[100%100%100%10%1100%100% The pattems are colour coded in table 8 in order to identify whether the tEs show preferences for certain valency sentence patterns of CONSIDER Occurrences of 10% and higher of a TE with a valency sentence pattern of CONSIDER are highlighted in the respective colour of the pattern. As can be seen, the TEs seem to cluster around certain valency patterns of CONSIDER, indicating a congruence between local grammar and the TEs, i.e. the meaning. Therefore it can be deduced from Table 8 that the TEs are not equally suitable for all the valency sentence patterns the verb CONSIDER can occur with Rather, it seems to be the case that the TEs are dependent on the valency sentence pattern of CoNSIDER as many TEs show a preference for a valency sentence pattern of CONSIDER(occurrences of 50% and higher are in bold ). Despite these tendencies it is14 erforderliche Ausgewogenheit. In 28-G ‘Ansicht’ is part of a support-verb-construction with the verb SEIN ‘BE’, the whole TE is ‘der Ansicht SEIN’ (Lit.: ‘can be considered’), while in 29-G ‘Ansicht’ is part of the phrase ‘PRONOUN Ansicht nach’ (Lit.: ‘in someone’s view’) which represents an adjunct, functioning as a hedging device that can be added to almost any sentence. [4] 3. Do the syntactic valency sentence patterns of CONSIDER relate to TEs? In the following analysis an investigation into the correspondence of the valency sentence patterns of CONSIDER and its most frequent German TEs is undertaken. The key questions to be explored are whether the valency sentence patterns of CONSIDER have preferred TEs, and if so, whether these TEs occur with a valency sentence pattern similar to that of CONSIDER. Table 8 shows an extract of the valency sentence patterns of CONSIDER and the most frequent TEs of CONSIDER. The multi-word TEs are still shown as single words, but a distinction is made as to whether these function as support-verb-constructions or as adjuncts. The occurrence of a TE for a valency sentence pattern of CONSIDER is given in percentages, based on 50 randomly chosen concordance lines from the EuroParl corpus for each German TE. Table 8. Valency patterns of CONSIDER and translation equivalents The patterns are colour coded in Table 8 in order to identify whether the TEs show preferences for certain valency sentence patterns of CONSIDER. Occurrences of 10% and higher of a TE with a valency sentence pattern of CONSIDER are highlighted in the respective colour of the pattern. As can be seen, the TEs seem to cluster around certain valency patterns of CONSIDER, indicating a congruence between local grammar and the TEs, i.e. the meaning. Therefore it can be deduced from Table 8 that the TEs are not equally suitable for all the valency sentence patterns the verb CONSIDER can occur with. Rather, it seems to be the case that the TEs are dependent on the valency sentence pattern of CONSIDER as many TEs show a preference for a valency sentence pattern of CONSIDER (occurrences of 50% and higher are in bold). Despite these tendencies it is