L6 Results Exposition by TEM for afternoon journeys on foot were in line with those of Figo et.al.a striking difference was noted when each of the three peak hours was considered singly (Fig.2).9.It can be observed 9-10.: that during the first hour (HI)of the peak period, journeys on foot resulted in a considerably lower level of Co exposure.10.Although levels for journeys on foot generally exceeded those modeled for car journey during H2,during the last hour (H3)the levels for journeys on foot were again frequently far lower than for car journeys. 11.A quantitative analysis to determine modeling 11.: uncertainties was applied,based on the maximum deviation of the measured and calculated levels within the considered period.12.Using this 12.: approach,the average uncertainty of the model prediction for this study slightly exceeds the 50% acceptability limit defined by Jiang.13. 13.: Nevertheless,these results suggest that data obtained using TEM to stimulate Co exposures may provide more sensitive information for assessing the impact of traffic management strategies than traditional on site measurement. Issues to think over in writing the Results: pp.113-122 in Glasman-Deal,H.(2010).Science Research Writing:For Non-Native Speakers of English.Unit 3 Writing about Results.Imperial College Press. In the above extract from the book,answers to the following questions are available: Why not start by describing my results? Why should I re-state the original prediction or the findings of other research here? Do I need to compare my results with those of other researchers? Why do I have to use evaluative language-why not simply describe the results which are in the figure or table? Isn't a word like"striking"considered too informal? Should I explain my results as well as present them? How do I know which results to describe in detail?Why not describe all of them in detail? Do I need to mention problem in the results?Won't it make the reader doubt my result? How can I talk about problems in the results? 2/7L6 Results & Exposition 2 / 7 by TEM for afternoon journeys on foot were in line with those of Figo et. al. a striking dif erence was noted when each of the three peak hours was considered singly (Fig. 2). 9. It can be observed that during the first hour (H1) of the peak period, journeys on foot resulted in a considerably lower level of CO exposure. 10. Although levels for journeys on foot generally exceeded those modeled for car journey during H2, during the last hour (H3) the levels for journeys on foot were again frequently far lower than for car journeys. 11. A quantitative analysis to determine modeling uncertainties was applied, based on the maximum deviation of the measured and calculated levels within the considered period. 12. Using this approach, the average uncertainty of the model prediction for this study slightly exceeds the 50% acceptability limit defined by Jiang. 13. Nevertheless, these results suggest that data obtained using TEM to stimulate CO exposures may provide more sensitive information for assessing the impact of traf ic management strategies than traditional on site measurement. 9-10.: 11. : 12. : 13. : Issues to think over in writing the Results: pp. 113-122 in Glasman-Deal, H. (2010). Science Research Writing: For Non-Native Speakers of English. Unit 3 Writing about Results. Imperial College Press. In the above extract from the book, answers to the following questions are available: Why not start by describing my results? Why should I re-state the original prediction or the findings of other research here? Do I need to compare my results with those of other researchers? Why do I have to use evaluative language - why not simply describe the results which are in the figure or table? Isn’t a word like “striking” considered too informal? Should I explain my results as well as present them? How do I know which results to describe in detail? Why not describe all of them in detail? Do I need to mention problem in the results? Won’t it make the reader doubt my result? How can I talk about problems in the results?